Saturday, October 04, 2025

What Journalists Mean By Truth

Forty-some years ago, when we were writing our textbook, Raising Hell: How the Center for Investigative Reporting Gets the Story, my colleague Dan Noyes and I described what we called the hypothesis-driven method of journalism.

It’s a tricky business, this hypothesis methodology. You’ve got to have some basic evidence that indicates a pattern plus a suspicion, an instinct, a guess about what you’ll find as you keep searching.

But a hypothesis is not the same as a conspiracy theory, and you don’t publish your hypothesis. You use it, just like a scientist would, to investigate where the truth lies. We understand that this may frustrate true believers who wish reporters would just substantiate their theories.

An example historically is the JFK assassination on November 22, 1963. Perhaps no other event inspired more complex yet largely unfounded theories.

How could something like this have happened without a conspiracy? As years passed, even though no credible evidence emerged to substantiate any of the wilder theories, certain individuals continued to stoke the conspiracy fires and keep them burning.

Oliver Stone exploited this more skillfully than most, imagining how the conspiracy might have unfolded in his movie, “JFK”, which has shaped subsequent generations’ views about the event. That he patched in real footage, including the Zapruder footage that is the only known visual evidence of the shooting, made his docudrama feel more realistic than it actually was.

As a result, if you ask people, say, in their 50s or younger today about the assassination, they probably believe we all witnessed it on television as it happened. But that is incorrect: Nobody saw it on TV, because there was no live coverage of Kennedy riding in his motorcade at all. In fact we never saw any video evidence until a full decade later, when the Zapruder film of Kennedy’s head exploding was finally declassified and released to the public.

All of this only complicated the effort of journalists like me who actually tried to investigate the assassination. Maintaining our commitment to stick to the facts is not as sexy as publishing fantasies based on conjecture. But all we can do is stay alert and adjust our hypothesis in light of any new evidence as it emerges. We can’t afford to get wedded to any one hypothesis until and unless the preponderance of evidence becomes obvious.

Otherwise all you end up with are conspiracy theories.

To this day, whether someone else in addition to Lee Harvey Oswald was behind the Kennedy murder remains unproven. And that is the truth.

(This is an edited version of an essay I’ve published previously.)

HEADLINES:

Friday, October 03, 2025

An "Unwell" President Seeks Total Control

Rep. Madeleine Dean of Pennsylvania has been one of the few so far in Washington to say what many are thinking: Donald Trump is losing it.

His rambling speech before the assembled military brass this week was unhinged. As he ages out before our eyes, those around him are moving quickly to consolidate as much power as possible.

The government shutdown is providing an excuse for firing many more federal employees and closing agencies Republicans don’t like, including those meant to achieve critical oversight of the President.

Meanwhile, the military has been instructed by this unwell leader to prepare for “war” against the “radical left.” In terms of the rhetoric alone, this harkens back to the days of J. Edgar Hoover and COINTELPRO.

The Watergate scandal sank the man then in the Oval Office, Richard Nixon. But bad as he was, Nixon never approached the point where he possessed the amount of centralized power Trump has accumulated.

For the second administration in the row, Americans are witnessing the cognitive decline of an elderly President. The difference is that Biden’s aides kept his decline secret until the debate where it became painfully obvious to everyone.

Meanwhile, the people around Trump cannot hide his decline due to Trump’s narcissistic need for constant media attention.

It’s enough to make you shake your head and mumble to yourself, “This really is No Country for Old Men.

HEADLINES:

  • Trump charts path to total control amid government shutdown (Axios)

  • A straightforward explanation from Rep. Madeleine Dean of why Trump is “unwell” (CNN)

  • Trump hits independent agencies, spares the big stuff – for now (Politico)

  • ‘Dangerous Cities,’ the Military, Trump and the Founding Fathers (NYT)

  • Senior government officials privately warn against firings during shutdown (WP)

  • F.D.A. Approves a New Generic Abortion Pill (NYT)

  • The Justice Department Won’t Break Easily (Atlantic)

  • Drones, Helicopters, Hundreds of Arrests: Trump’s Immigration Crackdown in Chicago So Far (NYT)

  • Pope Leo XIV says those against abortion but in favor of death penalty are “not really pro-life” (CBS)

  • Marjorie Taylor Greene reflects an emerging MAGA split (NYT)

  • US-born citizen sues after twice being arrested by immigration agents (ABC)

  • Israeli forces have intercepted 39 boats carrying aid and foreign activists, including Swedish campaigner Greta Thunberg, to Gaza, leaving only one vessel still sailing towards the Palestinian enclave, the flotilla organizers said. (Reuters)

  • How the world is responding to Israel’s interception of the Gaza flotilla (Al Jazeera)

  • An attack on a synagogue in Manchester has left Britain on edge (NPR)

  • Disney’s image tanks among Republicans, Democrats after Jimmy Kimmel controversy (CNBC)

  • ‘KPop Demon Hunters’ vocalists draw musical inspiration from Black American hip-hop artists. (Reuters)

  • New project makes Wikipedia data more accessible to AI (TechCrunch)

  • Trump Asks JD Vance To Research Whether President Allowed To Kill Vice President (Onion)

Thursday, October 02, 2025

Saving Telehealth

(To contact your Congressional representatives about saving telehealth for Medicare patients, or to forward them this essay, click on these links for your personal contacts in the House or the Senate.)

For me, the government shutdown became personal with an early Wednesday phone call informing me that my telehealth appointment with my nurse practitioner scheduled for today would no longer be supported for Medicare patients.

What is a major inconvenience and scary development for me must be a complete disaster for many other elderly and disabled patients.

Telehealth has without a doubt improved medical care for millions of people. It became popular during the pandemic but has persisted since for the most vulnerable among us — those too ill and/or too weak to get themselves to their doctor’s office in person.

Video appointments can allow health care providers to manage larger patient loads because remote appointments can be faster and more efficient than in-person appointments. In-person checkups are preferable for other reasons, of course.

I’m not going to get into the politics of the government shutdown other than to say there appears to be plenty of blame all around. Republican cuts to Medicare are embedded in Trump’s “big (ugly) bill” and the continuing care for millions of people like me is at serious risk going forward.

My reaction to this news was seething hatred for everything associated with the Trump regime. This awful man is systematically wrecking our society piece by piece. Every decent, kind, humane policy is at risk now.

Jane Fonda is right once again. All of us need to find ways to resist this authoritarian in our midst. Trump is a cancer. Democracy is the patient. The treatment is for us to somehow contain and limit the spread of this tumor.

HEADLINES:

Wednesday, October 01, 2025

Friendly Fire

An incompetent fool obsessed with facial hair is in charge at the Pentagon. A would-be authoritarian relentlessly seeking total control is in the White House.

Together on Tuesday, they ranted before the assembled leaders of the military, hastily assembled at their bidding in a manner that suggested urgency.

While Hegseth focused on his battle against DEI, Trump told the generals and admirals he wants them to use cities like San Francisco, Chicago and New York as “training grounds” for the “war within.”

If you were a screenwriter, tasked with creating a scenario for a disaster movie, you couldn’t make this stuff up.

It’s too serious.

And when it comes to the war within, it’s becoming real as a one-sided assault by the President of the United States against democracy.

In this war, our most treasured freedoms are set to become collateral damage.

Killed by “friendly fire.”

HEADLINES:

  • The Commander in Chief Is Not Okay (Atlantic)

  • US government shuts down as midnight deadline passes (Guardian)

  • Judge Rules Trump Unlawfully Targeted Noncitizens Over Pro-Palestinian Speech (NYT)

  • Trump’s ominous move to recruit generals and admirals to his political cause (CNN)

  • Trump directs generals to defend US from ‘war from within’ (ABC)

  • Trump defends troops in US cities after Hegseth decries military DEI efforts (Guardian)

  • Trump says he’ll fire generals “on the spot” if he dislikes them (Axios)

  • Military leaders absorb highly partisan presentation from Trump, Hegseth (WP)

  • Deadlock Grows Uglier as Congress Heads Toward Shutdown (NYT)

  • Trump Floats ‘Irreversible’ Cuts To Benefit Programs If Government Shuts Down (Time)

  • Trump to Americans: “Go F*ck Yourself”; shuts down Republican-controlled government, increasing monthly health care costs by hundreds of dollars (Gavin Newsom)

  • How Tom Homan wound up ensnared in an FBI contracts-for-cash sting (MSNBC)

  • Trump threatened to withhold billions in federal funds from New York City should democratic socialist mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani win the election. Mamdani, whom Trump has repeatedly described as a “communist,” isn’t backing down. [HuffPost

  • Trump administration moves to defund inspector general watchdog group (WP)

  • Judge issues blistering opinion against Trump policy to deport pro-Palestinian students (Guardian)

  • Trump peace plan ‘ignores interests of Palestinian people’, Hamas official tells BBC (BBC)

  • Afghanistan’s internet goes down amid fears of a Taliban crackdown (WP)

  • Google’s AI Mode image search is getting more conversational (Verge)

  • Stress-Free Eric Adams Spends Day Bribing Pigeons In Central Park (Onion)

Tuesday, September 30, 2025

Paranoia

(From 2009.)

So, it was nothing, right? Even though I didn’t stop shaking for an hour afterward. Who knows why, maybe because I have been reading Dave Cullen‘s spellbinding bookColumbine, but today I felt I had a brush with terrorist-instigated mortality.

It was a day like any other. Except that today I had to fulfill my civic duty by showing up for jury service. Now, I have never served on a jury, during my 38 years since I relocated here in San Francisco, though I have often answered the summons from Superior Court to do so.

I have no particular aversion to such service, but the only times I’ve made it past the screening process to actually sit down in a judge’s room, I have been rejected during voir dire, due to my background as an investigative reporter.

Anyway, today I joined the line of citizens waiting to enter one of our local court buildings, when a nervous-acting man ahead of me caught my attention. He was a white man, balding, dressed in formal clothes, with a pot belly, large, dark-rimmed glasses, and an extremely nervous manner about him.

To enter the building, one has to clear security. Two places in front of me was a younger woman. One place in front of me was this suspicious-acting man.

As she started to go through the security device, he pushed into her rear end. She turned around, and confronted him. “Excuse me?”

She cleared.

He didn’t. All sorts of alarms went off.

“Maybe it’s your belt, sir, try taking that off,” said the security guard. He did that but he also pushed through again, still triggering an alarm.

At this point, the guard waved me through. As I turned to pick up my cellphone and keys, the suspicious man was exploding with anger.

“What is your name?” he was screaming at the security guard. Clearly, he was trying to intimidate her, as if he were above being challenged for the right to enter the court building.

I proceeded into the central jury pool room with another hundred of my fellow citizens. Then began a long, boring, two-hour process of being excused from service. Halfway through, something extremely disconcerting occurred.

That same man, now looking paler than ever, entered the jury room from the back of the room. He sat for a moment, then walked toward the front and exited. Along the way, he deposited a book on a table in the precise center of the facility.

From that moment on, I was sure we were all dead. This was certainly a terrorist, angry at who knows what (there are so many injustices in our courts, almost anyone could turn into a mass killer, right?).

The next hour was one of the longest of my life. At first, I tried to find someone to alert about that book. Why would such a strange acting man do what he had done? Is there a “bomb squad” around to secure the item?

But no, here in the bureaucratic belly of the beast, I was stuck. No cops. Nobody but a nice young woman who said I couldn’t leave the room until my name was called.

Fine, I thought. I’ll die this way if it comes to that. After all, who ever heard of an exploding book? Probably the guy is just the kind of madman who drops crazed literature in public places.

That’s pretty much it. Nothing further happened. I was excused. And I scooted out of that place, gratefully. As I glanced back over my shoulder, however, I saw that the book was still there.

Headlines:

  • Trump, Democrats leave meeting without deal to avoid government shutdown (Axios)

  • Plan to send troops to Portland remains riddled with uncertainties (WP)

  • Portland councilor, Army veteran, calls on service members to reject Portland military deployment (OPB)

  • Feds Request 100 Military Personnel Be Sent To Illinois: Pritzker (Patch)

  • America’s Illiberalism Doom Loop (Atlantic)

  • Trump’s promise of auto industry boom is not panning out as planned. (Reuters)

  • Energy Dept. adds ‘climate change’ and ‘emissions’ to banned words list (Politico)

  • Trump secures Netanyahu’s agreement to Gaza peace proposal, but doubts remain (Reuters)

  • Mormon church shooting suspect had Trump sign outside home, records show (Guardian)

  • ‘You’ll never need to work again’: Criminals offer reporter money to hack BBC (BBC)

  • Trump announces 100% tariff on foreign-made movies (CNN)

  • Cannabis stocks soar after Trump shares video promoting drug’s use for seniors (Guardian)

  • California Governor Signs Sweeping A.I. Law (NYT)

  • DeepSeek: Everything you need to know about the AI chatbot app (TechCrunch)

  • ICE Confirms Agents Do Not Have Faces Beneath Masks (Onion)

Monday, September 29, 2025

Bad Habits

“To achieve style, begin by affecting none.”
― E.B. White, The Elements of Style

______

I do not have anything against using artificial intelligence (AI) on editorial projects; I am not a Luddite. If anything, I tend to welcome new technologies and look for how they might improve our lives.

On the other hand, I hate fake things, which includes much of the AI-assisted writing out there so far. One of my main issues is that English provides an abundance of word choices and finding the right ones includes not overusing the wrong ones

So it’s not surprising an article that caught my eye recently reported that certain words and phrases are starting to pop up everywhere from social media posts to news articles to academic publications. The author suggested that this might be an indication of the increasing use of ChatGPT and other large language models (LLMs).

The words in question include delves, showcasing, underscorespivotal, realm and meticulous.

These are all perfectly fine words when used with discretion, but when they are employed too abundantly, problems arise.

One of those is that overuse induces a cluttered feeling, confusion, awkwardness, boredom, the sense that one may be in the presence of a writer who is, shall we say it, lazy. Or, you might say, robotic.

Alas, those overusing AI in their writing probably never consulted the brief but classic volume co-authored by E.B. White and William Strunk, Jr., called “The Elements of Style.”

To quote this guide, which ideally would be on every writer’s desk:

“Vigorous writing is concise. A sentence should contain no unnecessary words, a paragraph no unnecessary sentences, for the same reason that a drawing should have no unnecessary lines and a machine no unnecessary parts. This requires not that the writer make all his sentences short, or that he avoid all detail and treat his subjects only in outline, but that every word tell.”

If only we all followed that advice, perhaps AI would learn to as well.

HEADLINES:

MUSIC VIDEO: He thinks he’ll keep her - Mary Chapin Carpenter (live 1993)

Sunday, September 28, 2025

Sunday Mix

HEADLINES: