Saturday, June 06, 2026

Trump's Anti-Immigrant Plan Exposed

(California Governor Update: Becerra is in front with 26.78%, followed by Hilton with 26.35% and Steyer with 21.35% of the votes counted. According to the AP, only 68% of the total votes have been counted.)

Among its many bad moves, perhaps the most shameful is the Trump administration’s treatment of immigrants.

Now, thanks to a former Social Security Administration executive, Jeremiah Schofield, we know that DOGE officials had planned to classify 2.7 million living people as dead, which was intended to intimidate immigrants into leaving.

The plan included some U.S. citizens and permanent residents.

Schofield revealed the plan in a 49-page whistleblower disclosure to Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.). It offers the most detailed account yet of how officials from Elon Musk’s U.S. DOGE Service sought to use Social Security data in service of Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown.

According to the Washington Post, “Schofield’s whistleblower complaint describes a tumultuous period inside Social Security, as career officials questioned the legality of such efforts and watched DOGE officials gain access to some of the government’s most sensitive databases. In one meeting, Schofield said, a DOGE official working with the Department of Homeland Security described the goal of declaring 2.7 million living people dead: making immigrants so miserable that they self-deported or went to Social Security offices for help, where they could be arrested.”

Social Security carried out a smaller version of the plan last year, marking 6,100 immigrants as dead.

HEADLINES:

  • DOGE officials planned to mark 2.7 million living people as dead, according to a whistleblower. (WP)

  • US Senate passes $70bn ICE funding bill: What comes next? (Al Jazeera)

  • DOJ could still pay Jan. 6 rioters even without ‘anti-weaponization’ fund (NBC)

  • Graham Platner Faces Accusations Of ‘Toxic’ Relationships And Disturbing Behavior—Days After Sexting Scandal (Forbes)

  • Democrats are increasingly frustrated with Graham Platner in Maine Senate race (WP)

  • Judge Says Trump Officials Must Restart Asylum and Immigration Processing (NYT)

  • Trump’s Name Is Disappearing From More Than Just the Kennedy Center (Atlantic)

  • Trump’s Iran war messaging is not winning over Americans – or their representatives (Guardian)

  • Why can’t California count? (Silver Bulletin)

  • What to know about the deal between Israel and Lebanon extending their shaky ceasefire (AP)

  • The US economy added 172,000 jobs last month, extending the labor market rebound (CNN)

  • America’s Farms Depend More Than Ever on a Troubled Visa Program (NYT)

  • AI Agents Now Generate More Web Traffic Than Humans (CNET)

  • Anthropic says the world should have option to ‘pause’ on AI (Guardian)

  • Can These Ads Make You Love A.I.? (NYT)

  • Zeus Lands Cameo Role As Trojan Soldier In ‘The Odyssey’ (Onion)

Friday, June 05, 2026

Nobody Knows

(They're still counting ballots in California.) 

The older I get, the whole puzzle of life on earth seems like it should be simple. We need to find the right balance that allows us all to exist together. That’s about it, but whether we will ever be able to do that is another question.

There’s a synchronicity to your life and my life and all of our lives — what each of us does affects everyone else. Everybody wants and needs the same basic things.

My Canadian-born grandmother was in a nursing home in her 90s when we went to visit one winter’s day to take her out on a day trip. We went to a nearby hilly area where we parked and watched people with sleds go up and down a gentle incline.

There was fresh snow and my tiny grandmother sat in the front seat watching for a while before pronouncing, “‘Round and ‘round everyone goes, and where they stop nobody knows.”

That was it, just a childhood rhyme. She had nothing else to say.

My grandmother stopped more than half a century now and the world has changed in dramatic ways, yet her truth remains. Everyone is still riding the merry-go-round and where they stop nobody knows.

HEADLINES:

Thursday, June 04, 2026

Waiting for...(Hope)

In “Waiting for Godot,” Samuel Beckett described two tramps, Vladimir and Estragon, who wait endlessly by a tree for a mysterious figure named Godot. But he never arrives.

Well out here in California, we might all feel a bit like those guys as we wait for the ballots to be counted from our latest primary election.

Beckett was concerned with existentialism, the meaninglessness of life, and the futility of hope.

These ideas may be familiar to us, but I, for one, reject the futility of hope.

There are many critics of California’s primary system, which allows the top two vote-getters to move forward to compete in the general election in November.

But at least in theory, this process reduces the stranglehold the two-party system has on our politics and promotes something more akin to a parliamentary process where multiple factions of the parties get to face off and compete for votes.

Of course, in reality obscene amounts of money distort the process, and the role of campaign advertising paid for by special interests can overwhelm voters as they try to make their choices, but I still think it is better than party primaries.

At least this way minority interests get an airing.

That said, the outcome in California will almost certainly be the Democrat Becerra v. the Republican Hilton. And that in all likelihood would have been the result of party primaries as well.

So this essay was supposed to be about hope, but I guess most of us out here are just sitting back and waiting for that particular item to arrive, just like Godot.

HEADLINES:

 

Wednesday, June 03, 2026

Counting the Ballots

The Governor of California is more like a head of state. The state’s economy ranks as the fourth-largest in the world, competing with Japan’s. The state is home to everything from Hollywood to Silicon Valley.

Artificial intelligence? Headquartered here.

Shohei Ohtani? Plays here.

So when it comes to counting their votes for Governor, Californians know a lot is at stake.

As I publish this morning, 58 percent of the vote is in. Republican Steve Hilton is in the lead with 27.8 percent, closely followed by Democrat Xavier Becerra at 25.4 percent.

Democrat Tom Steyer is third with 19.6 percent.

The only other candidate in double figures is Republican Chad Bianco with 11.3 percent.

California provides universal mail-in ballots, which are valid if postmarked by Election Day and received by election officials up to seven days later.

Many, many voters take advantage of mail-in ballots. Take me, for example. I’ve lived at my current address for six years but I’ve never been to my polling place. In fact, I don’t even know where it is.

As for which two candidates will ultimately prevail, it appears that will be Hilton and Becerra. But Steyer remains close enough behind the front-runners that no one can call the race yet.

The preponderance of mail-in ballots will be Democratic, which may well carry Becerra to the top of the pack. Hilton’s strong showing probably means he will be the other candidate to move on to the November ballot.

But the math gets really difficult for Steyer. He should get a bump from the mail-ins, just like Beceera, but it is not likely that that will be enough to overtake the top two.

So that is the report at press time. I believe it will Beceera v. Hilton in November.

And that Ohtani may win this year’s National League’s Cy Young Award.

HEADLINES:

Tuesday, June 02, 2026

To Be California's Governor

If you believe the polls, Former state Atty. Gen. Xavier Becerra has created enough space between himself and the 60 other people vying to replace Gov. Gavin Newsom as California’s Governor that he should qualify as one of the two candidates to survive tonight’s primary election.

The question is who will be the other?

Again, if you believe the polls, it will most likely be another Democrat, billionaire Tom Steyer, or a Republican, conservative commentator Steve Hilton.

Steyer and Hilton appear to be running neck-and-neck at this late stage of the race.

At stake is whether the next five months will feature an internecine battle between the two Democrats or a more traditional contest between the two major parties.

If it’s an inner party showdown, that will pit the moderate Becerra against the progressive Steyer.

When it comes to Hilton, there’s no mystery to where he stands, as he was endorsed by Trump.

Meanwhile, Newsom will step aside courtesy of term limits and he’s widely expected to run for President in 2028.

HEADLINES:

  • Trump Said to Be Backing Off Plans for $1.8 Billion Fund After Backlash (NYT)

  • Iran suspends peace talks and threatens ‘closure’ of Strait of Hormuz (FT)

  • Iran warns Israeli attacks in Lebanon threaten ceasefire with US (BBC)

  • U.S. and Iran launch fresh strikes (NBC)

  • Trump’s Iran War Success Story Gets Blown to Pieces (TNR)

  • How California’s New Congressional Map Is Reshaping Tuesday’s Primaries (NYT)

  • The bizarre race to succeed California Gov. Gavin Newsom (WP)

  • Trump picks housing Dir. Bill Pulte as acting intelligence chief, replacing Tulsi Gabbard (CNBC)

  • One by one, U.S. civil rights agency dismantles tools to fight discrimination (NPR)

  • Dr. Harry Edwards on NAACP’s Call for Black Athletes to Boycott After SCOTUS Guts Voting Rights (Daily Kos)

  • Losing Trust in Justice Dept., Judges Call Out Its Lawyers’ Behavior (NYT)

  • The Trump administration is working on a deal to give weapons-grade plutonium to energy companies (CNN)

  • Who’s leading the wide-open 2028 Democratic presidential field? (WP)

  • Trump is facing a new inflation warning from the bond market, adding to his midterm challenges (AP)

  • Ukraine is now Europe’s war. Survival can’t be the only aim (Economist)

  • Right-wing candidate pulls ahead in first round of Colombia’s presidential vote (NPR)

  • As Ebola spreads, the institute Fauci once led stays on the sidelines without a leader (NBC)

  • Congrats, you never have to write another cover letter (BI)

  • Is A.I. Replacing Tech Workers or Providing an Excuse for Job Cuts? (NYT)

  • Florida AG sues OpenAI, seeks to hold CEO Altman personally liable for alleged harms (CNBC)

  • AI fiction is the new fast food (WP)

  • This University System Went All In on A.I. Now It’s Tearing Itself Apart. (NYT)

  • Tearful Trump Claims He Was Sex-Trafficked By Epstein (Onion)

Monday, June 01, 2026

Talking About Climate

What makes global climate change so difficult is it feels too big and overwhelming for us as individuals to have any impact.

But that isn’t true.

In our daily lives, we can eat a more climate-friendly diet, including seasonal, local foods; install solar panels, recycle, invest in sustainable technologies, conserve resources and limit our consumption of fossil fuels, among other steps.

As citizens we can support leaders who get it and expel those who don’t from office. Organizing efforts by environmental activists have been responsible for much of the progress we’ve made on the issue; so donating to non-profits who are working on the issue is another option.

But perhaps the most important step we can take is changing the way we talk about it -- not as an apocalyptic inevitability but as a mitigable inevitability. Although it is too late to stop climate change, we may be able to limit its catastrophic effects on future generations.

In this context, converting government fleets to electric vehicles, promoting the collection of rainwater by agencies, and reducing public waste all will help. If governments mobilize for collective action, there may be ways to better prepare our populations for what is to come.

Explaining the impending crisis to young children is appropriate as long as it isn’t done in ways that overwhelm them. After all, they will be dealing with this throughout their lives, so getting used to the tradeoffs early on may spur them to help us find solutions.

Most children instinctively want to make things better; they are our greatest natural resource. 

And though the steps I’ve described may seem small in the face of the scope of climate change, they at least represent hope.

Future generations deserve at least *that* much from us...right now.

(This is an update from an essay in 2021. Getting government to take the indicated steps has obviously become much more difficult under Trump.)

HEADLINES:

 

Sunday, May 31, 2026

Where the Money Goes

Millennials (AKA Gen Y) are those born roughly between 1980-1996. They have been defining marketing trends since they came of age. Now, they are in the process of inheriting more wealth ($68 trillion) from their baby boomer parents than any generation in history.

And they are digital natives.

They’ve grown up in a world dominated by the technology companies. Virtually every one of them carries a mobile device in their pocket or purse that is capable of housing all of the world’s known information over the entire sweep of time, i.e., the millennia.

So it makes sense that one of the otherwise obscure stories that caught my eye this week is how millennials have embraced digital banking over the traditional brick and mortar banks we grew up with.

When it comes to transferring money, cashing or depositing checks, paying bills or making investments, they are rapidly transitioning to green, paperless systems that has rendered the old savings and loan of “It’s a Wonderful Life” lore to the history books.

That chapter will henceforth have to be titled “It *Was* a Wonderful Life.”

I’m still getting used to the fact that the days when I took my teenagers to our local bank branch to open their first checking account are a relic of history they won’t be repeating with their kids. When we made those trips, the “bankers” would shake my kid’s hand and say something like, “You’re a real adult now.”

They wore a certain self-satisfied smile when they said that, like they knew something the kid didn’t. I’m pretty sure it’s called “debt.”

As a kid I learned about banking in an odd way. As something of a purported math whiz, I was studied by the local bank when it was first introducing computers into its arsenal, in the early 60s. It was only a matter of time before ATMs would be replacing tellers and, well, the rest of that is history.

After studying my pattern-recognition skills for a spell, the local banker guy told my father that unfortunately, I was not “banker material, psychologically.”

Alas, perhaps that is why my personal millennials will not be inheriting very much of that $68 trillion generational wealth -- what has been dubbed as the “Greatest Transfer of Wealth of All Time.”

I spent all of my reporting career “following the money” rather than accumulating it.

Sorry, kids.

(I wrote this five years ago.)

HEADLINES: