Getting Wired.2

By the time I joined the HotWired team in late 1995, I’d been working in media for almost 30 years. This was not necessarily a good thing in the eyes of my new colleagues, who were busily upending the analog media world I came from with a digital alternative they considered far superior.

“Content wants to be free” was a standard rallying cry at HotWired, which was not yet two years old and was undergoing a massive growth spurt fueled by corporate advertising revenue. We were hiring people almost as fast as we could; I joked to friends that our interviewing strategy was to lock the door behind candidates so they couldn’t leave once they were inside.

But nobody wanted to leave -- if you were Gen-X and into creative media work in the mid-1990s, this is exactly where you wanted to be.

As for me, I was twice as old as most of the other employees, and my career had been almost entirely in the alternative media, not the mainstream. From my days in the underground press to SunDance to Rolling Stone to the Center for Investigative Reporting and from New West to Mother Jones and public radio plus other stops along the way, I had pretty much remained outside of traditional journalism institutions.

But in those jobs I did adhere strictly to the values and standards of traditional journalists.

My new colleagues were early-stage writers and reporters and editors and designers and photographers and engineers and interface experts and audience research specialists and several other categories of workers, almost all of them in their mid-to-late 20s.

To most of them, I was probably sort of like a nutty uncle.

They used a techno lingo unfamiliar to me, with terms like web browser, domain name, interactivity, bandwidth, interface, pixels, TCP/IP, url, html, coding, style sheets, IP address, network domain and on and on -- so many strange words that I scribbled them down on a scrap of paper and kept it in my pocket exactly as I did with foreign language phrases when visiting non-English-speaking countries overseas.

After a few months, I finally got around to asking someone what all of these words actually meant. He smirked and quipped: “Don’t worry what they mean; just sprinkle them liberally into your speech and your market value will triple.”

As I pondered that, the daily political site my team produced called The Netizen began to flourish. We rapidly built a large audience during the early months of election cycle 1996, which attracted the interest of Wired’s co-founder and CEO, Louis Rossetto.

He had a reputation as an articulate visionary but an extremely difficult boss; many employees seemed fearful of his outbursts. He was a fierce advocate of libertarian political views, a lifelong Republican, pro-corporate and bluntly dismissive of leftist ideas.

So when Rossetto first summoned me to a private meeting I really didn’t know what to expect. Most of my previous work had appeared in left-leaning publications, and he probably assumed my politics were defined by that. Maybe he wanted to suss me out.

From our very first meeting, the Louis I got to know was quite different from his image. He was smart and opinionated, true, but also quiet-spoken, thoughtful and happy to debate the issues of the day with me at great length. Most importantly, he was committed to remaining open-minded about how we covered those issues in The Netizen.

That kind of tolerance was essential if I was to remain part of the Wired organization, which I already knew I wanted to do. Louis and I quickly developed a mutual trust that allowed us to argue through the various sides of the issues we were covering and agree to disagree when we could not reach a consensus.

Meanwhile he never interfered in my actual editorial choices, though they repeatedly differed from what I know he would have preferred.

The ultimate test came when one of our cantankerous Netizen columnists decided to write a piece savagely critical of Wired itself. He decided to lambast the institution and everything it stood for in his daily column.

Talk about biting the hand that feeds you! This surely would be too much for Louis to handle, I thought.

As the hit piece was about to post, I was gathering up my family pictures from my desk to put in my briefcase since I assumed that I’d soon be out of a job again. But first, as a courtesy to Louis I let him know what was coming. His response was shocking and refreshingly direct:

“Let him rant!”

We ran the piece unedited. My job was secure.

For me, that moment confirmed that Rossetto was committed to his principles, which started with free speech for everyone.

Looking back on that incident, I realize that by then dealing with bosses other people considered difficult was becoming something of a habit for me; after all, I’d studied under one the masters, Jann Wenner at Rolling Stone. Others may have feared these men and their legendary outbursts, but I genuinely liked them and developed a deep fondness for both Jann and Louis that lasted well past my jobs with them.

A few months after the “Let him rant” episode, Louis suddenly summoned me to his office again for an unscheduled meeting. Again, I assumed there must be bad news of some sort, but instead he surprised me by saying he wanted to move me to the top of the org chart as V.P. of Content Management for all of the websites in the HotWired network.

I was content producing The Netizen and hadn’t sought this role at all but of course I agreed to it, especially because it came with a hefty raise, and at home we had another baby on the way.

In my new role, dozens of people now reported to me, including my former bosses who were about half my age and seemed stunned by the change.

(To be continued)

HEADLINES:

• Opening his presidential center, Obama urges resistance to ‘cynicism and despair’ (CNN)

• Israel and Hezbollah agree to a ceasefire after intensified fighting threatens U.S.-Iran talks (NBC)

• Vance postpones Iran talks trip (Axios)

• The Iran War Was a Spectacular Failure (New Yorker)

• Vance Issues Blunt Warning to Israel as He Defends Trump’s Deal (NYT)

• Read the full text of Trump’s preliminary U.S.-Iran agreement to end the war (NPR)

• US lifts naval blockade as Iran’s supreme leader says Trump made deal ‘out of desperation’ (BBC)

• Iran announces plans to bring in maritime fees for strait of Hormuz (Guardian)

• Traffic flows through Hormuz as U.S.-Iran deal takes effect, questions remain (Reuters)

• Hegseth Berates NATO Allies for ‘Shameful’ Response to U.S. War in Iran (NYT)

• Drone strikes beyond the battlefield pump up market for technology to repel them (Reuters)

• Labour Mayor Wins U.K. Special Election, Clearing Path to Challenge Starmer (NYT)

• President Trump Has a Pool Problem. The Nation Has Thoughts. (WSJ)

• ‘Everything has its own order and purpose’: The rainforest ‘farms’ defying modern agriculture (BBC)

• Ancient Sherwood Forest oak tree reputed to have sheltered Robin Hood has died (CNN)

• What does the AI revolution mean for you? (WP)

• Bernie Sanders unveils plan to give the public direct ownership of AI companies (AP)

• The surprisingly simple ways AI can be tricked into breaking its own rules (WP)

• New York City Mayor Presents Knicks With Key To His Car (Onion)

 

Getting Wired

Late in 1995, I was invited over to the headquarters of Wired magazine by one of the editors, John Battelle, who knew me from my years teaching at U-C Berkeley.

The magazine’s office had cubicles, computers, rock ‘n roll playing in the background and a few dogs lounging around.

But the real attraction lay on the other side of a common kitchen area where HotWired, the online side of Wired magazine, was located.

It was a striking scene. Row after row of 20-somethings sat working on laptops perched on doors balanced over sawhorses, with the Chili Peppers blasting and a whiff of marijuana in the air. A couple of my former interns stood up to greet me and showed how they were designing content for a wide range of websites.

Right after I left the office, I called home to say, “I’ve just found the next place I want to work.”

Several weeks later, HotWired offered me a job as producer of what would be the web’s first daily political news site, called The Netizen.

Although the starting salary was barely half what I’d previously been making, and I did have the needs of a new family at home to consider, I accepted the offer without hesitation and said I could start the next day.

On day one, I was introduced to a small staff of producers and designers with hardly any journalism experience. But they were smart, highly motivated and ready to invent something.

I quickly hired two of the brightest young journalists (and former students) I knew from Berkeley and set out to work with the developer team -- the head engineer was a former colleague from Mother Jones, and we set a crash course to build The Netizen.

We launched the website in something like 28 days.

It was a presidential election year, so we hired three experienced political writers as our correspondents and they fanned out across the campaign trail to cover the re-election effort of incumbent Bill Clinton and his Republican challengers, including the eventual nominee, Bob Dole.

I had been assured complete editorial independence for the operation, and it quickly attracted a large audience among the early adopters then flocking to the web. Day after day we published smart, snarky takes from all sides of the political spectrum with a decidedly libertarian streak, in accordance with the dominant philosophy of Silicon Valley.

For me it was exciting -- my young staffers were quickly developing editorial skills, and we were able collectively to generate controversy almost without trying.

Email was still a new phenomenon, and the feedback from readers that poured in upon publication included some that were outright abusive, often misogynistic, which disturbed me and was a harbinger of things to come.

Thinking back with the benefit of hindsight, I had an early glimpse of how hate, lies and conspiracies might flourish in this new environment, but I didn’t know what to do about that at the time.

Free speech was free speech, I told myself somewhat naively. And outside of the negative stuff, I liked the chaotic two-way communication cacophony of the web. It was a free-for-all.

Our readers blasted off at our writers in ways traditional journalism never had experienced. Those of us from legacy media were used to being the last word on a topic. In this new media, as I told a Poynter symposium, we were only the first word. It was a conversation, not a broadcast.

Everyone on staff handled it in relatively good spirits as The Netizen quickly rocketed into position as one of the leading news sites on the web.

If I was the pilot, it felt like I was guiding a ship far out into space, destination unknown.

(To be continued.)

HEADLINES:

• U.S. and Iran sign deal ahead of schedule (Axios)

• The Text of the Deal (NYT)

• Trump says the US will resume bombing if Iran doesn’t comply with agreement (CNN)

• Questions linger over U.S.-Iran deal as details remain murky (PBS)

• Trump Does Not Understand the War He Lost (Atlantic)

• Trump is in a sea of trouble over Iran (Spectator)

• Moscow hit by largest Ukrainian attack since start of Russia’s full-scale war (BBC)

• Fed Holds Rates and Leans Toward Fighting Inflation With Future Increases (NYT)

• Trump says intelligence chief pick’s hearing is off and Pulte will remain for now (WP)

• Senate delays Jay Clayton’s nomination for intel director after Trump post (NBC)

• The death rate in ICE immigrant detention centers more than doubles under Trump (Reuters)

• Georgia Republicans Shelve Redistricting as Anger Grows (NYT)

• El Niño is here, so what does it mean? (NPR)

• Inside the push to keep RFK Jr.’s vaccine agenda alive (WP)

• News sites are the new newspapers: People are abandoning them for social media (Nieman)

• How Ukraine Uses A.I. to Knock Deadly Russian Drones Out of the Skies (NYT)

• The private school choice boom leaves behind many kids in public school (AP)

• The White House’s capricious controls on Anthropic (FT)

• China isn’t trying to beat the U.S. at AI — it’s playing a completely different game (Fortune)

• The Cloud Has Sound: The Unrelenting and Unseen Cost of A.I. Data Centers (NYT)

• E.T. Admits Shock At Not Even Being Called For Cameo In ‘Disclosure Day’ (Onion)

 

Peace on Earth? (Maybe)

I’d comment on the Iran peace deal, but I can’t because the details are secret. It doesn’t appear that Trump got anything from this war other than what was already had. And this cost us many billions of dollars.

Oh, and somebody should probably tell Israel.

So onto other matters.

Update on my tomato plant wars: Although we’ve never identified the animal that stole our plants, the garden has provided a large number of new plants that sprung up from last year’s plantings.

So I am now tending to over a dozen new plants. Enemies beware. 

This is truly a World Cup house and as France won its first match, 3-1, the place erupted into a state of bedlam. My grandchildren are not only French fans, three of them are French citizens as well.

So, there will be a good deal more cheering to come at our house this summer, I presume.

HEADLINES:

• Trump turns his attention to Ukraine ahead of Iran deal: ‘I’m going to do whatever I can’ (CNBC)

• Trump insists Iran deal will open Strait of Hormuz ‘toll-free’ as he meets world leaders (BBC)

• Trump claims victory over Iran, but deal is silent on nuclear weapons (WP)

• Trump’s Iran Deal Looks Worse Than Obama’s—And I’m Glad He Made It (Bulwark)

• Doubts swirled around the US-Iran interim deal to end the war in the Middle East as shippers said it could take weeks for confidence to return after any reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, and fundamental questions remained unanswered. (Reuters)

• Oil Futures Extend Decline on Optimism About U.S.-Iran Deal (WSJ)

• Higher prices for gas, groceries and flights will outlast the Iran war, experts say (AP)

• NATO’s Permanent Crisis (Foreign Affairs)

• Records reveal $600M estimate for Trump’s ballroom project, with half from taxpayers (WP)

• Federal Judge Blocks Idaho Law Criminalizing Transgender Bathroom Use (NYT)

• US primaries in Oklahoma, Georgia, others: Key takeaways from the results (Al Jazeera)

• Trump’s favored candidate won in a closely watched Alabama Senate contest. Find four takeaways from races in Alabama, Oklahoma and Georgia here. (WP)

• COVID-19 vaccine linked with lower risk of heart attack, stroke: Study (The Hill)

• As the US approaches its 250th birthday next month, two out of five Americans do not believe it will endure another 250 years, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll ‌that highlighted deep divisions over how the nation views itself. (Reuters)

• The Newsground turns to coffee to fund investigative journalism (Nieman)

• Giants players’ ‘Pride Night’ hat stance criticized by broadcaster Mike Krukow (NBC)

• SpaceX is buying AI coding startup Cursor (BI)

• The hidden risk of Trump’s Anthropic crackdown (Axios)

• How Anthropic lost the White House’s trust — and then its flagship product (WP)

• Humanity isn’t ready for the coming intelligence explosion (Economist)

• Study: More Americans Foregoing College In Favor Of Letting The Carnival Sort Them Out (Onion)

Are Manners Obsolete?

(I first published a version of this essay six years ago and it feels quaint. Lots has changed since then, with the coming of AI, and being polite is hardly our main concern.)

One legacy of the Covid-19 pandemic is the increased use of robots in our society. Among their advantages, they don’t need masks or social distancing and they don’t take sick days, vacations or parental leave.

They also don’t easily take offense when treated badly or need to be thanked for doing a good job. In fact they don’t require any emotional involvement whatsoever.

As robotized services including Alexa and Siri have become more embedded in our offices and households, a question that occurs to me is what long-term impact are they having on the way we communicate with each other.

It starts, as do all things, with the children. Kids quickly learn to ask Siri or Alexa to do something in a commanding voice, which then becomes anger if the robot cannot comply with their wishes quickly enough.

I wonder how a child growing up in such circumstances will treat his or her employees in the future?

When voice commands first became a thing, I found myself speaking in a respectful voice and often thanking Siri for her help. Siri never replied. The engineers who developed her apparently hadn’t bothered to work “you’re welcome” into her vocabulary.

Thus, my politeness fell on deaf ears.

And although this type of software is supposed to be intelligent, i.e., it learning from interacting with us, in my experience our robotic friends are in no way learning to be more polite.

As for humans, when we are not rewarded for being polite, we tend to become less so over time. Gradually, for example, I’ve learned to issue simple straight-out commands to my voiced units. There is no point in engaging in social niceties with an entity that doesn’t respond accordingly, is there?

But what I am conditioning myself to become?

When it comes to the people who have designed the relevant software in this case, many of them value direct, logical and blunt sentences. Social skills simply are not at a premium during an intense Agile development cycle.

As our society populates the environment with robots, maybe the ultimate effect will be that nobody will have much of a reason to be nice anymore.

This would, of course, resemble our political culture, where it seems politeness and respect for others became extinct some time ago.

Indeed, being not nice is often a virtue in modern America. And those who cheer on the misogynist, racist, homophobic demagogues at political rallies? They resemble nothing so much as robots.

The news summaries in an age like this might as well be compiled by robots as well, but in fact I’ve done the ones that follow in the old-fashioned way. They are hand-picked. Please enjoy them.

HEADLINES:

• US, Iran agree to ceasefire, sending stock futures higher and oil lower (Yahoo)

• Iran war day 109: Tehran, Washington, sign MoU electronically (Al Jazeera)

• Trump Winds Down the War He Started With Goals Unmet (NYT)

• Trump’s Iran Deal Is a Humiliation for Him—and Good News for the World (Nation)

• Authorities in southern Lebanon warned people displaced by three months of war between Israel and Hezbollah against rushing home despite ‌the US-Iran deal, as Israel said it would not withdraw troops from the south. (Reuters)

• 82nd Airborne Deployment to Israel Went Unannounced (Military.com)

• FBI foiled alleged plot to attack White House UFC event, Kash Patel says (NBC)

• Eight Crew Members Dead in B-52 Crash at Air Force Base (NYT)

• ‘An awkward family gathering’: Trump and G7 leaders convene in France amid geopolitical divergences (CNN)

• Newsom Says Trump’s Justice Department Is Investigating Him and His Wife (NYT)

• Inside the Ludicrous, Deadly Serious Plan to Take Over Greenland (New Yorker)

• Trump ties FISA renewal to his stalled voting bill (Axios)

• Inside the Trump administration’s rapid rollback of gun regulations (WP)

• Voters are turning out against toxic pesticides. Will the Senate listen? (The Hill)

• As the U.S. turns 250, this historian has blunt advice: ‘America has to grow up’ (NPR)

• Vance’s fraud task force is sweeping up legitimate small businesses (WP)

• Britain Announces Social Media Ban for Children (NYT)

• What the ‘60 Minutes’ fiasco reveals about press freedom today (The Hill)

• ‘Jimmy Kimmel Live!’ Ratings Show Huge, Dramatic Swing (Yahoo)

• MLB sends warning letter to three Giants relievers for their anti-Pride Night protest (McCovey Chronicles)

• The US Government Is Letting a Key Data Center Regulation Expire (Wired)

• How a warning from Amazon led the White House to shut down Anthropic’s Mythos model (Fortune)

• AI robots can go rogue – a researcher on how easily it happens (Conversation)

• Bots Now Outnumber Humans on the Internet. Here’s What That Actually Means (CNET)

• Why AI Is Incorrigibly Didactic (Atlantic)

• How to Run a News Company in the Age of Polarization and A.I. Slop (NYT)

• MLB Demands Return Of All Foul Balls (Onion)

 

The World at Play

Among the options for ways to learn about and experience the larger world, travel is the best choice. If you go to enough places on several continents you begin to develop an appreciation for the diversity of human choices and conditions.

If you cannot travel, you can read books, watch films and try to meet those in your community who come from different countries and backgrounds. There also are ethnic restaurants, festivals and parades.

And then there’s sports, which brings me to the World Cup.

In our house there is a hand-drawn wall chart listing every matchup for all the teams playing in this year’s World Cup competition. My grandchildren drew it and filled in their predictions for all the games before the first match had been played.

Five of them did this by debating the merits of each squad from around the world, based on their knowledge as soccer players themselves and as fans.

We’ve had the games playing on TV all weekend. At one point, I found myself sleepily watching the match between Australia and Türkiye broadcast in Spanish with my 15-year-old granddaughter, who is fluent in French.

We both understand just enough Spanish to sort of follow the commentary, which was exuberant and fast-paced.

For those uninterested in the World Cup, or in sports generally, I can understand the irritation at all the hype.

But then again, this is the whole world coming together to play games and cheer their teams on in peace, not war, which is a lot better than the alternative.

HEADLINES:

• Iran and US agree deal to end war as Israel says its forces will stay in Lebanon (BBC)

• U.S. and Iran reach deal to extend ceasefire and open strait (Axios)

• U.S.-Iran deal explained: What we know — and what remains unresolved (CNBC)

• Trump Claims Strait Will Be ‘Permanently Toll-Free’ Under Agreement With Iran (NYT)

• Trump Celebrates While America Capitulates (Atlantic)

• A deal is only the beginning of the end of the US-Iran war (Economist)

• So Much for Leaving Abortion Up to the States (Atlantic)

• The White House UFC fights are a spectacle. And a reflection of America. (WP)

• Hospitals See Diseases Resurge as Vaccinations Decline (NYT)

• Congress has lost its grip on funding the government (WP)

• Russia Is Rich in Ballistic Missiles. Ukraine Is Short of Ways to Stop Them. (NYT)

• Pilot and 11 skydivers dead after Missouri plane crash, officials say (CNN)

• Trump at 80: A President ‘Really Uncomfortable’ With Aging (NYT)

• As UFOs go mainstream, the jury is out on what the existence of alien life might mean for religion (AP)

• Germany and Japan Are Rearming Again, 80 Years After World War II (NYT)

• Why American Christianity Ended Up Like This (New Yorker)

• US asks Anthropic to block global access to top AI models: Why it matters (Al Jazeera)

• The World’s Leading Deepfake Expert No Longer Trusts His Own Eyes (NYT)

• Why it’s nearly impossible to build a robot without China (Japan Times)

• For centuries, math has been a human endeavor. Does AI mean it’s over? (WP)

• The skills people still perform better than AI, according to workplace experts (AP)

• Study: Crying Not Linked To What You Said But The Way You Said It (Onion)

 

Mattering

I’m not sure that I ever fully appreciated it at the time — in fact, I’m quite sure I didn’t — but during the years that one of my chores was to drop my kids off at school or camp it actually was a privilege.

Like all adults trying to balance responsibilities, I probably complained about it on occasion, and it certainly could be stressful when we were running late.

But it was a privilege because it was one of my opportunities to play an essential role in our social ecosystem. 

Believing that your role matters is not always the easiest thing to achieve in American culture. Years later, when the kids were grown, I missed it. And I started feeling rather inessential. 

Retiring from work made everything worse, as my professional responsibilities, once deemed by many as weighty and significant, melted away just like those parental duties.

And it was that point that I started pondering how much I ever did matter in the larger scheme of things.

Early in 2020, just as the pandemic was arriving and I was recovering from a stroke, I moved into an assisted care facility. At the time it seemed like the only option left for me. 

Nothing against the staff members in there, most of whom were terrific, or the residents, but every minute I spent in that place my hope was evaporating and my spirit was being crushed.

But in the end I was one of the lucky ones who escaped. My family rescued me and that’s why I can tell this little story today.

As I woke up one recent morning, it was obvious that the heat wave had finally broken. Fresh cool air swept in from the ocean. 

As I drank my first cup of coffee, my 12-year-old granddaughter appeared. Her parents were busy and she asked if I could give her a ride.

Without hesitation, I grabbed the car keys.

HEADLINES:

• Trump says US-Iran deal to be signed on Sunday as Tehran casts doubt on timing (BBC)

• Iranian foreign minister says deal with U.S. “never been closer” (Axios)

• Israel carries out air strikes on Lebanon, state media says, as Iran claims deal with US near (BBC)

• The U.S. and Iran Might Actually Have a Deal (Atlantic)

• What’s the deal on the Iran-U.S. peace deal? (Reuters)

• Judge Blocks National Parks From Removing ‘Negative’ Signs (NYT)

• Congress has lost its grip on funding the government (WP)

• America Has a Credit Card Problem, Just Not the One You Think (WSJ)

• Ariana Grande tells White House to stop using her music (CNN)

• Americans Are Reaching a Financial Breaking Point (Nation)

• The Supreme Court Hands a Surprising Death-Penalty Defeat to Alabama (TNR)

• DNI Gabbard Reveals Evidence of U.S. Taxpayer-Funded Global Biolab Program (DNI)

• Global HIV prevention declined drastically after Trump aid cuts, U.N. finds (WP)

• Hegseth Loses His Holy War (Bulwark)

• We’re replaying the Civil War, but the turf this time is the US government (Reveal)

• An Honored Canadian Journalist on the Importance of Investigative Reporting (NYT)

• A Court Has Ruled That Google Is Liable for False Statements Generated by AI Overviews (Wired)

• Anthropic cuts off Fable 5 and Mythos 5 access following government order (Verge)

• Battery breakthroughs will lessen AI’s demand on the electricity grid (WP)

• This Ford exec used Claude to build her family a ‘chief of staff’ (BI)

• Olive Garden Unveils New ‘We Invented Spaghetti’ Slogan (Onion)

Setting Aside Bias

What is expected of journalists is very much like what we ask of jurors.

When the members of a jury are selected, they are asked whether they can be fair in coming to a judgement — whether they can put aside any biases or pre-existing opinions about the people and issues involved in that trial in order to come to a dispassionate, balanced decision based not on beliefs or prejudices but on the facts as established in sworn testimony.

They are also reminded of this pledge by the judge when they receive instructions just before they begin their deliberations.

The analogy is not perfect but what we demand of jurors is similar to what we insist of journalists when we send them out to gather the facts for stories.

Editors and news directors recognize that reporters are just like anyone else in that they have their own beliefs, opinions, biases, blind spots and flaws. That’s only human.

But what a good journalist, like a good juror, has to set that all aside in favor of an all-consuming commitment to get it right.

That this is hard to do is obvious, especially when the truths we discover contradict our core beliefs, prejudices or assumptions. But, as I’ve said many times to student journalists, you can’t discover the truth as you wish it to be, you have to report the truth as you discover it to be.

The integrity of our legal system depends on jurors who can follow strict jury instructions in a search for the truth. The integrity of our press depends on journalists who can maintain a similar discipline in their search for truth.

And our democracy depends on both.

HEADLINES:

• What’s in the Iran deal Trump says he’s ready to sign (Axios)

• Qatar pursued secret talks with Iran to shield gas complex from strikes, security officials say (WP)

• Whipsawed Between Fear and Relief, Iranians Hope for War’s End (NYT)

• Judge blocks DOJ ‘anti-weaponization’ fund for longer, wants guarantee it’s dead (CNBC)

• Trump’s allies have another way to pay ‘weaponization’ victims (Reuters)

• US to cut air and naval assets deployed for NATO operations in Europe (Al Jazeera)

• SpaceX stock pops 20% in first trades after record-breaking IPO (BI)

• Elon Musk becomes the first trillionaire after SpaceX surges out of the gate (WP)

• Americans Are Already Paying Dearly for the National Debt (Atlantic)

• Steve Hilton’s Chances of Beating Becerra to Flip California: New Poll (Newsweek)

• California’s schools are emptying out. Experts say it’s only going to get worse. (SFGate)

• In Cesar Chavez’s Labor Union, Women Often Worked in Fear (NYT)

• Silicon Valley needs to get God (Economist)

• Alarm as Ebola spreads into new areas of DR Congo (Al Jazeera)

• El Niño and the Iran war may spark hunger crisis for more than 100 million (WP)

• Suspect in Fatal Shooting Is Dead After a Standoff in Texas, Officials Say (NYT)

• Scientists gave an octopus a mirror. Here’s what happened next (BBC)

• Justice Dept. Clears Way for Paramount-Warner Bros. Merger (NYT)

• Live market odds: Are we heading for the hottest year on record? (Weather Channel)

• As World Cup Begins, Mexico City Becomes a Global Stage (NYT)

• Tom Hanks bought a 1930s Royal standard typewriter at Berkeley Typewriter last week (Berkeleyside)

• What 370,000 College Essays Tell Us About A.I.’s Effects on Creativity (NYT)

• EPA Approves Use Of Napalm As Pesticide (Onion)