Friday, May 01, 2026

The Great Tomato Plant Mystery

A couple weeks ago, my daughter-in-law sent over six young tomato plants for my birthday.

I placed them into some loose, moist soil in a gardening box in the backyard, patted the soil down firmly, watered them and ever since have been tending to them on a daily basis.

They seemed to be adapting to the relocation pretty well, responding to the sunshine and the water I give them from a watering can every day around noon.

Until yesterday.

When I went out back to look in on them, only five remained. One of the smaller tomato plants had simply disappeared, roots and all.

Gone without a trace.

I have to say that in my many years of gardening, this has never before happened. Who stole my tomato plant?

It wasn’t a mole burrowing from below, because the plants are in a box.

I’m thinking the thief had to be a bird, although I’ve never seen that happen before. There was no hole and no tracks around where the plant had been.

So if anyone sees a bird’s nest with a small tomato plant wrapped into it, please let me know.

HEADLINES:

  • Trump slams Germany’s Merz again as rift over Iran war widens (Al Jazeera)

  • The UAE doubles down on Israel and America (Economist)

  • The Iran War’s Ramifications Have Only Just Begun (Atlantic)

  • The US is pushing for other countries to form an international coalition to restore freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz, according to a State Department cable (Reuters)

  • Congress votes to end record shutdown, sending DHS funding bill to Trump’s desk (NBC)

  • Public rejects Trump’s ballroom by wide margin (WP)

  • Trump taps Nicole Saphier for surgeon general after pulling Casey Means nomination (CNBC)

  • Louisiana congressional primaries are suspended as a result of the Supreme Court’s ruling (AP)

  • What Alex Padilla says Democrats should do about the Voting Rights Act ruling (Politico)

  • Can the E.P.A. Survive Lee Zeldin? (New Yorker)

  • This ABC Showdown Is Different (Atlantic)

  • Meta lost 20 million users last quarter (Verge)

  • Ukraine bets on battlefield AI as the race for weapons autonomy intensifies (AP)

  • The Bloomberg Terminal Is Getting an AI Makeover, Like It or Not (Wired)

  • OpenAI blames ‘nerdy personality’ for ChatGPT obsession with goblins (NBC)

  • Musk fights in court to portray himself as hero, not villain, in founding of OpenAI (WP)

  • A.I. Spending Sets a Record, With No End in Sight (NYT)

  • Elon Musk Seemingly Admits xAI Has Used OpenAI’s Models to Train Its Own (Wired)

  • Overambitious Man Wants To Get 2 Things Done Today (Onion)

Thursday, April 30, 2026

Civil Rights Regression

When the Supreme Court struck down what remained of the Voting Rights Act on Wednesday, it completed the reversal of one of the signature achievements of the civil rights movement of the 1960s.

Previously, black people in the segregated South and elsewhere faced obstacles to voting; the Voting Rights Act provided a remedy for that problem.

But racism is deeply engrained in American society, not just in the South but everywhere and the problem has become more complex as America has gotten more diverse.

When it comes to the progressive era of civil rights, I remember attending and covering the last demonstration led by Martin Luther King — it was in Memphis in late March 1968. At that march, a mixture of hope and fear hung in the air over our heads as thick as the Beale Street Blues. 

Hope that change might yet be possible; fear that violence might lay just around the corner. Both proved to be true. MLK was assassinated a week later and the Voting Rights Act proved to be his greatest legacy.

Sadly, the rights of our non-white citizens have now reverted to their pre-movement status of 60 years ago, thanks to a reactionary Court packed by Trump. What will be required is a new movement to reclaim those rights on behalf of everyone.

HEADLINES:

 

Wednesday, April 29, 2026

The King Speaks

There is an art to public speaking, especially in these politically charged times, and King Charles displayed a masterful command of that art in his address to Congress Tuesday, which was charming and remarkably persuasive.

The King managed to articulate multiple points of disagreement with the Trump administration, but deftly avoided direct criticism and somehow united Democrats and Republicans on issues upon which they rarely agree, like the war in Ukraine, the exercise of checks and balances on executive power, and support for the environment.

He gently chided those, including Trump, who have questioned the U.S. role in NATO, the UN and reminded his audience of the significance of such alliances generally.

Perhaps he was most eloquent when speaking subtlety but effectively about climate change, never mentioned it by name but referencing “melting Arctic glaciers” and tying economic success directly to proper stewardship of nature.

It was, as I said, a masterful performance. We can only hope that some of our political leaders were actually listening, because if they were they might learn a thing or two about governing in a democracy from the king of the nation that spawned ours..

HEADLINES:

  • Who holds the cards in Iran-US talks? (Al Jazeera)

  • Trump warns Iran ‘better get smart soon’ as he weighs military options over Strait of Hormuz (NBC)

  • Iran’s economy has been battered. Its leaders still think Trump will blink first (AP)

  • Trump Skeptical of Iran’s Strait of Hormuz Proposal (WSJ)

  • U.S. is ‘being humiliated by Iran,’ says Germany’s Merz, as Europe’s patience wanes (CNBC)

  • What are OPEC and OPEC +, and why has the UAE quit? (Al Jazeera)

  • The diplomacy at play behind the King’s speeches (BBC)

  • Could the Florida Gerrymander Blow Up on the GOP? (Bulwark)

  • ‘It’s bizarre’: Californians grapple with revelation that suspected Trump gunman was neighbour (BBC)

  • King Charles’s rare state visit offers U.K. a chance to mend ties with Trump (WP)

  • Epstein scandal lingers in background of King Charles’ visit to Washington (CNN)

  • F.C.C. Orders a Review of ABC’s Broadcast Licenses (NYT)

  • FCC to direct Disney-owned TV stations to file early license renewals, source says (NBC)

  • Kash Patel’s Implausible Lawsuit Against The Atlantic (New Yorker)

  • Trump Administration Secures New Indictment Against Comey (NYT)

  • Judges rule Pentagon can require reporter escorts during policy appeal (The Hill)

  • Supreme Court Appears Divided Over Roundup Weedkiller Case (NYT)

  • An amateur just solved a 60-year-old math problem—by asking AI (SA)

  • Altman, Musk and the A.I. Spectacle Come to ‘The Town’ (NYT)

  • Farmer Buys Guardian Dog To Protect Livestock From RFK Jr. (Onion)

Tuesday, April 28, 2026

Bad Jokes

After a few brief calls for unity after the shooting incident Saturday night, Trump renewed his assaults on free speech by (again) demanding that ABC fire Jimmy Kimmel for a bad joke.

In the context of the attempted assault at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner Saturday night, Kimmel’s joke two nights earlier that Melania Trump had the “glow of an expectant widow” does indeed sound rather tasteless.

But back on last Thursday night, when he made the joke, he was referring to the age differential (24 years) between the First Lady and her husband. 

Besides, the point of having free speech in a society isn’t to cover nice remarks, the ones we all find comfortable and acceptable.

No, it is to cover the uncomfortable, the unacceptable, the bad jokes in bad taste.

Trump makes plenty of those himself.

But you didn’t hear any of Trump’s opponents demand he be censored for comparing himself to Jesus, which many considered blasphemy. Or by saying the “only good Democrat is a dead Democrat,” or ridiculing Nancy Pelosi’s husband after he was almost killed by an assailant.

There are many more examples of “bad jokes” by Donald J. Trump. Kimmel’s only problem in this case was unfortunate timing. 

The Trump administration is hypocritical through and through. The attacks on Kimmel are only the latest example. 

Kimmel himself handled the controversy deftly on his show Monday night. Watch: Jimmy Kimmel on Melania & Donald Trump Demanding His Firing & The White House Correspondents’ Dinner.

HEADLINES:

 

Monday, April 27, 2026

The Sound of Slippers

When you lift a new pair of slippers out of their box, the first thing you notice (besides the extensive packaging) is that they appear to be identical. There is no right, and there is no left. They’re programmable.

So you make a choice and begin the process of training them to fit your feet, or maybe it’s training your feet to fit them, I’m not sure, but the day inevitably comes when you mix them up as you get dressed in the dark. Your feet instantly tell you how to fix that problem.

As long as you don’t think too deeply about it, living is a bit like breaking in a new pair of slippers.

I was not aware of this until recently, when I could suddenly feel my old slippers again and it mattered after many months which one was right and which one was left.

It’s called “peripheral neuropathy” when you lose the feeling in your extremities. The doctor taps the reflex hammer on your knee and foot but nothing happens. The jerk has come out of your knee. It is common after a stroke. 

Not to worry. Physical therapists, or the Internet, can teach you how to get that feeling back. It’s the kind of exercise that hurts just enough to actually feel good. 

***

Today, listening to the train whistles as they passed nearby, I remembered a sheet posted in the kitchen at one of the places I worked. It had pictures and words. “Compost these items (food scraps, etc.); Recycle these items (look for a the appropriate symbol); Place the rest in the trash.”

The sign’s creator couldn’t resist an editorial comment: “Almost nothing should go into the trash.”

***

Another programmable element in our lives arrives periodically in the form of election ballots. They’re sort of like slippers, they don’t arrive pre-set for the right or the left. Nothing compels us to vote the way we’ve voted previously. 

This year is another election year; most years are.

There are many positions on most ballots. Can you imagine what would happen if a meaningful percentage of voters considered their choices with an open mind?

Aristotle proposed something like that.

So whatever your choices on this year’s ballot, just tap your finger and be glad that peripheral neuropathy — or a tyrant — hasn’t taken your voice away…yet.

(This is an excerpt from an essay I wrote six years ago. Those slippers are old now and have retired.)

HEADLINES: 

 

Sunday, April 26, 2026

Can a Billionaire Fix This?

Californians will elect a new governor to replace Gavin Newsom later this year and the upcoming primary has become a wildly unpredictable affair since two of the Democrats dropped out of the crowded race. 

For some valuable insight into this contest, I recommend Susan Zakin’s piece, “The Mole,” which profiles billionaire Tom Steyer and the other remaining candidates contending for the job.

Steyer presents us with an odd dilemma. Is there such a thing as a good billionaire? We’ve become accustomed to the notion that some ultra-rich people devote substantial portions of their wealth to philanthropic purposes, but what about a guy who is trying to buy his way into office in order, he says, to do good?

During our lifetimes, the wealth disparity between rich and poor has grown to such an extreme that these two classes might as well be living on separate planets. (And maybe, if some predictions come true, someday they will.)

Meanwhile, the much-vaunted “middle class,” which was supposedly one benefit of democracy’s regulation of unfettered capitalism, has virtually disappeared.

Today’s youth who have grown up in families at that formerly middle class level are struggling to ever be able to own a home or even afford to raise kids. They fear dropping below the poverty line in an unwelcoming job market. Many question whether a college education is worth the debt that inevitably accompanies it.

These are the bread and butter issues Steyer or whoever is California’s next governor will have to confront.

We know billionaires try to buy elections and sometimes they win. We know they're good at wrecking things. But can they ever do something that helps the rest of us?

That is the trillion-dollar question.

HEADLINES:

Saturday, April 25, 2026

(Not Really) Retired

My career in journalism coincided almost perfectly with the rise and fall of the profession during the late 20th and early 21st centuries.

Thus any narrative of those years could serve as a personal version of the historical record. The first half had lots of highlights, Rolling Stone, the Patty Hearst stories, the Center for Investigative Reporting, “Circle of Poison,” SalonWired News, book deals, Hollywood, and awards.

The second half was a constant dance from job to job as media institutions lost out to Internet-based companies including social media.

During the dozen years before my first retirement, I held jobs at startups MyWire, Predictify and GreatNonProfits; consulted for clients including Wikimedia Foundation, which publishes Wikipedia, and the California Academy of Sciences; worked with a wonderful French software company called Smub, and took on part-time gigs as a media analyst/blogger for BNET and 7X7.

In the last two positions, I met and interviewed founders of Twitter, Lyft, Airbnb, Uber, Nextdoor, Getaround and dozens of other companies as the age of social media came into being.

Occasionally, I put my investigator hat back on; for example, I wrote a report that of the 44 board members of the largest social media companies early on, none were women.

As I reached the age of 65, further employment opportunities seemed to be limited, so I decided to retire. This was early in 2013.

But retirement bored me and within months I had rejoined a former employer, KQED, as a part-time blogger. The public media company had a large radio and TV footprint, but only a minor web presence.

Next, as senior editor for digital news at KQED, I assembled a team of writers and producers that built a large digital audience to complement the legacy broadcast services.

We also started an ad hoc investigative team at KQED that produced award-winning reports on police violence, sexual abuse, and official corruption.

Finally, in late 2019, health issues forced me to retire again, 53 years after I had started at the age of 18.

Once again “retire” was probably not the right term because that was seven years ago now and marked the start of my daily newsletter, several thousand of which have appeared to date.

HEADLINES: