During my recent trip to Arizona, my sister told me a story about an incident that happened when I was in kindergarten. Apparently, we were sitting on our front porch when I spotted a girl I liked walking toward our house on the sidewalk.
As the girl drew near, I grabbed a newspaper, held it up and pretended to read it.
“That happened today?” I called out loudly. “How interesting!”
***
Most of the time, I’m the oldest one in the room, so when it comes to memories, mine reach back the furthest. So it is a refreshing experience whenever I get to hang out with my older sister, who remembers things that I don’t.
It is also nice to be just a character in the memory of somebody else as opposed to the being the family patrician and sole custodian of the now-distant past.
I was almost 30 when my first child was born, and almost 60 when my first grandchild was born. That’s a lot of rings on the tree for me to try and recall when my descendants ask me specific questions about my past.
Besides, the way I tell a tale is not necessarily more accurate than anyone else, plus the more distant in the past an event occurred, the more our individual versions are likely to diverge, which brings me to the phenomenon of memory consensus.
Within families, communities, countries, cultures — even on a species level — we ultimately tend to reach some sort of consensus about the past, though historians, ideologues, contrarians and poets continue to debate and revise that consensus as new evidence emerges.
And as much as I enjoy telling my descendants stories from the past, I’m acutely aware from my journalism career that for a more well-rounded narrative, other sources ought to be interviewed. My version is only that — mine.
A joint family memoir would no doubt do a better job. As the saying goes, ‘there’s your version, my version and the truth and no one is lying.’
As for the story of the girl and the newspaper at the top of this essay, I had no memory of it until my sister told me about it last week.
That said, it has the ring of truth.
(This is from 2023.)
HEADLINES:
Social Security Says DOGE Ruling Could Force Agency to Shut Down (Bloomberg)
As Massive Social Security Changes Begin, Here's What You Need To Know (Forbes)
Inside Trump and Musks’s Takeover of NASA (New Yorker)
Trump says Education Department will no longer oversee student loans, 'special needs' (NPR)
US small business agency to oversee student loans (BBC)
Elon Musk visits Pentagon after bombshell reports on access to China war plans (Axios)
Elon Musk threatens Pentagon leakers after NYT report on secret China war briefing (Politico)
Trump rescinds order targeting law firm after it makes $40m promise (BBC)
Trump asks the Supreme Court to stop judges from blocking his policies (MSNBC)
Threats to federal judges increasing, US Marshals Service warns (ABC)
Recession watch 2025 (Financial Times)
Democrats open whistleblower portal aimed at DOGE (Axios)
Weekslong lockups of European tourists at US borders spark fears of traveling to America (AP)
Low-Cost Drone Add-Ons From China Let Anyone With a Credit Card Turn Toys Into Weapons of War (Wired)
Democrats are angry, disillusioned over party’s failure to stand up to Trump and Musk (WP)
People are angry, and they’re showing up at town halls to let their Congresspeople know. DOGE workers are getting doxxed. (BusinessInsider)
Were the Kennedy Files a Bust? Not So Fast, Historians Say. (NYT)
Five Takeaways From the New JFK Assassination Files (WSJ)
Boat tours and ash scatterings help beleaguered California salmon fleet stay afloat (AP)
Snow White’ remake drags Walt Disney back into the culture wars (Financial Times)
What the Press Got Wrong About Hitler (Atlantic)
AI is more likely to give a correct response when given the opportunity to give a wrong one first (Medium)
Experts Recommend Using Hunger As Egg Substitute (The Onion)
MUSIC VIDEOs:
Taylor Swift - "Will You Still Love Me Tomorrow" (Carole King) | 2021 Induction Olivia Rodrigo - "You’re So Vain" (Carly Simon) | 2022 Induction