Saturday, January 29, 2022

Virtual Money

When talking to my financial advisor recently, I mentioned that my usual habit of holding some cash reserves as a ‘rainy day fund’ might be a bad idea this year given the current levels of inflation.

After all, cash will lose its value over time when prices are rising rapidly, as they are at present.

He agreed and so we reduced my cash reserves.

Then I brought up the opportunities presented by blockchains, NFTs, bitcoin, and web.3. (Definitions below). 

Should I be looking for investments in crypto currencies? I’d read that bitcoin might double in value over the coming year and there is plenty of chatter on various lists I follow.

“Direct investments in those are a bad idea,” he said. “Those stocks are going to be too volatile for a retiree like you. Leave them for younger people.”

He was right of course. Directly investing in bitcoin, which is a decentralized digital currency, and similar products might be a smart long-term investment for an adventurous 30-year-old, but not for me.

This conversation was a reminder how much one’s opportunity to improve one’s finances reflects not only current trends and your future expectations but your stage of life. I may well live long enough — say 25 more years — to make high-risk gambles on crypto sensible but very few actuaries would advise me to make them.

Actuaries, in case you don’t know one, specialize in analyzing statistics in order to calculate insurance risks and premiums. My parents wanted me to become an actuary when I went away to college, which is one of the reasons I initially majored in math.

But I soon discovered in Ann Arbor that I wasn’t suited to be a true math major, let alone an actuary. As for calculating risks, as a muckraker by trade I turned out to be a lot better at taking absurd risks than calculating or avoiding them.

I’m sure the actuary I could have become would have turned purple in the face by the risk/benefit equation that was my actual career. When it came to love, money and exposes, I didn’t exactly play any of it safe.

Nonetheless, I enjoyed enough success eventually (mainly by NOT spending money) that now I can have conversations about investment strategies that are not strictly theoretical. And while I should certainly not pour any money directly into crypto, there’s nothing wrong with indirect investments in, say, a company like Square.

Get it?

DEFINITIONS:

Web3 is an idea since 2014 for a new iteration of the Internet that implements decentralization, is currently celebrated by cryptocurrency enthusiasts, big tech companies, and venture capital firms.

blockchain is a sequential list of records, called blocks, that are linked together using cryptography. Each block contains a record of the previous block, a timestamp, and transaction data. The blocks form a chain, with each additional block reinforcing the ones before it. Therefore, blockchains cannot be altered retroactively.

An NFTor non-fungible token, is a unique digital representation of a good like a work of art. It's basically a certificate of authenticity or a deed and it is probably recorded on a blockchain.

Bitcoin is a decentralized digital currency, without a central bank or single administrator, that can be sent from user to user on the peer-to-peer bitcoin network without the need for intermediaries.

TODAY’s HEADLINES:

Friday, January 28, 2022

What's That Story?

 First off, I was to recommend a piece by Tony Rettman called “The Warriors of a Failed Revolution.” And here is why.

Many people know that I co-authored three long articles on Patty Hearst and the SLA in Rolling Stone magazine in the mid 1970s.

One of the reasons those articles, which have been identified as the biggest scoop in the magazine’s history, succeeded is they were written in a narrative style, much like a mystery novel.

The pace was at times breathless and the revelations helped to resolve major questions people had at the time. Why did the group kidnap Hearst and how did they evade the national manhunt led by the FBI to catch them for so long?

Did Hearst voluntarily convert to the SLA’s revolutionary cause or was she a victim of Stockholm syndrome-type brainwashing?

Who were the people helping them avoid being caught and what motivated them to do so?

There are only so many answers to such questions that an article written in narrative style can supply — even three articles, which is how many Howard Kohn and I wrote. Of the three, the final one, which didn't appear until 1976, the year following the capture of Hearst and her colleagues, was by far the best — and in it we attempted to provide more of the context for the drama captured in the first two parts of our trilogy.

The reason I am recommending Rettman’s article is that he explores some of the additional people and groups swirling around in the Bay Area left of that era, especially those aroundStanford professor H. Bruce Franklin, the Revolutionary Union and Venceremos.

As Rettman notes in his well-written piece, there was a great deal of crossover between the SLA and these characters, including their shared commitment to fringe ideologies advanced by conmen, law-enforcement informants, and career criminals masquerading as revolutionaries.

The whole thing resonates today because we are living through a similar period but this time a mixture of misguided characters have emerged from the right-wing corners of our society to wage their “revolution” via acts like the January 6th riot at the U.S. Capitol.

It doesn’t matter from which end of the political spectrum these people originate, they have always been wrong and they always will be wrong.

Our society is deeply flawed and needs major reforms, but not the types envisioned by the SLA, the RU, the Proud Boys or the Oath Keepers. 

Rettman’s piece is a reminder of that just when we need it.

TODAY’s NEWS:

Thursday, January 27, 2022

Virtual Reality?

From “Wag the Dog” to “Don’t Look Up,” Hollywood has long been exploring the potential for mass confusion between what is now called the Metaverse and what we have traditionally assumed to be our physical reality — especially when it comes to wars and other disasters.

In that context, what is war anyway? Is it bullets and bombs exploding somewhere out there or is that all just for show?

The dramatic conflict in Ukraine might be simply the latest offering on Channel 36 while “Emily in Paris” might qualify as a deduction on your tax return. It’s all a matter of how you frame things. There can be a seamless interface between the virtual and the physically palpable in our fragmented lives if that’s what we want — but then again, quantum physics suggests that it’s okay if those lines seem blurred.

It is fundamentally unknown (to us) what place Homo Sapiens occupies in the natural order; we may be cells in some much larger organism that we are only starting to be able to perceive. That would be an outer reality we don’t understand yet. We’re much better at looking inward and seeing how much is going on at the molecular level.

In fact, our technologies, those items we are so proud of, may be the mere beginnings of what we need to develop to become a truly “intelligent species. After all, how smart can we pretend to be when we still threaten to blow each other up over middling issues like the cost of fossil fuels?

There’s no future in that one, only the distant, decomposed past.

All of these thoughts come tumbling through my brain as I try to juggle the give-and-take between the various parties posturing for one another along the Ukraine border, real or imagined.

The whole thing just doesn’t make sense.

It makes me hope they all just back down soon so I can move on to another channel.

TODAY’s HEADLINES:

Wednesday, January 26, 2022

Friendship in the Plague

 Most of us have probably learned a hell of a lot more about how easily viral diseases spread over the past two years than we ever wanted to know. So choosing to lower your mask with somebody not in your immediate household requires new levels of trust when you realize that Covid-laced particles could be lurking to hitchhike on their words or even just on their breath.

Sharing the same airspace, therefore, isn’t merely a hazard for airplanes during a pandemic; it’s pretty crowded down here on the ground as well. You never know when you might collide with a random bits of SARS-CoV-2 that have just been “shedded” by another member of the human herd.

And when I think back about the people I’ve been privileged to hang out with during the pandemic it’s a testament to our collective willingness to assume that risk in order to enjoy the benefits of each other’s company.

Because the isolation imposed by the plague has truly been excruciating, at least for those of us who truly get tired of keeping our own company.

Indeed, friendship has never mattered more.

Relatively early on in this extended ordeal, it was remarkable how many old-time friends showed up courtesy of social media and reunion-style zoom calls. Some of that was due to my propensity to post daily musings on what was then known as Facebook. But as the coronavirus continued to evade the best tools our Big Pharma-led army can devise to corner it, our collective energy to connect seems to have started to wane.

The novelty of connection may simply be wearing off. Or maybe everyone is just as exhausted as I am. Or maybe isolation is becoming endemic — if so, Covid will truly have defeated us a a species.

But in fact for most of us, I suspect, having friends we can see in person matters as much if not more than it ever did in our careless past. Wordle, Scrabble, Netflix and YouTube TV can only take you so far into the day or night. Besides, I don’t know of any Netflix hits featuring one person finding love with that guy in the mirror, you know the one who just gets older and grayer every day.

Nope, people need people, as the old cliche goes and like many cliches this one is true. You can trust me on that. Journalists, as you know, specialize in truth.

TODAY’s HEADLINES:

Tuesday, January 25, 2022

Do You Like War?

...or is that a curser in your pocket?


With the world now seemingly teetering on the edge of war in Ukraine, historians would no doubt recall the beginnings of World War I over a century ago. But one major difference between then and now is the speed at which information travels back and forth between the potential adversaries.

Biden and Putin, the major players, talk now and again by phone but punctuate their conversations with threats and clarifications, some more like de-escalation messages than furthering the odds of war.

The intelligence services in the U.S. and the U.K. keep leaking potential scenarios — Russia will launch an all-out invasion, Russia will undermine the Ukrainian government from within, Russia will conduct a lightning strike, Russia will install a puppet regime.

Russia denies them all.

Anyway, these have the feel of video game options, as opposed to the real-world variety, so maybe what both sides need to do is open Battlefield 2042 instead of fighting over contested ground, some of which is already off-limits since it is the fiendishly contaminated zone from the Chernobyl nuclear disaster.

Meanwhile, the casualties are already mounting in one realm and that is the stock markets. Shares have broadly gone into free fall, with massive losses normally reserved for major economic downturns.

Investors don’t like uncertainty, so this volatility will persist until the major actors get their story together, and the other great uncertainty of the moment — Covid — resolves itself as well.

Honestly, all this global posturing and geopolitical psychodrama is so Henry Kissinger-esque. The man himself is nearing 99, which means he arrived not long after the end of first world war and has lasted long enough to be around for a third, if that is what is to happen here.

Let’s hope not, of course. The last thing anyone needs is another war. I’d vastly prefer to invest in GameStop instead. BTW, they’re down another 10 percent or so as of this morning.

TODAY’s HEADLINES:

 

Monday, January 24, 2022

Monday, Monday

 TODAY’s HEADLINES:

  • NATO said it was putting forces on standby and reinforcing eastern Europe with more ships and fighter jets in response to Russia's military build-up at Ukraine's borders. Former Ukrainian lawmaker Yevhen Murayev derided British allegations that he could be installed as leader of a Kremlin puppet government in Kyiv, and told Reuters in an interview that he was considering legal action. (Reuters)

  • State Department reduces staff at US embassy in Ukraine, orders some family members to leave (CNN)

  • Russia-Ukraine crisis: Why Brussels fears Europe is 'closest to war' in decades (BBC)

Sunday, January 23, 2022

Self


 

Sunday's News