Thursday, February 12, 2026

Something to Say

(This little piece dates from 2010 but I could have written it yesterday, or tomorrow.)


The season is approaching when I will begin to visit a few classes here and there, and deliver a few lectures (or interactive discussions) about writing, so naturally, thoughts about the topic creep into my head as I procrastinate about doing what I actually should be doing, which is writing of a different type.

For decades, I’ve said the hardest thing about writing is getting started, and the second-hardest is keeping going.

But those involve tactics.

Actually, the hardest thing about writing for virtually any writer is believing you have something to say.

Notice that I said “something” to say, not “anything.” Of course, once you’re experienced, you can string words together in your sleep, with your eyes closed, and your hands tied behind your back -- not that I’ve tried that particular experiment, and in any event, I’d need a willing partner to do so, which I do not have at present.

“Something” is not necessarily easier to locate with age and experience, though young writers often have it without knowing it.

Self-confidence is, of course, the slender carpet all artists stand on. We stretch, place our feet firmly, look up and out and beyond...and hope.

At that moment, it’s time for those tactics to kick in.

Good read: “Can Artists Help Shape American Cities Again?” (NYT)

HEADLINES:

 

Wednesday, February 11, 2026

AI & Democracy

Nate Silver, who irritates as often as he illuminates, has in his latest post taken on the techno-elephant in the room — artificial intelligence and the future of our democracy.

That is my characterization, not his. He simply says, “If AI is even half as transformational as Silicon Valley assumes, politics will never be the same again.”

He makes the following points:

  • Silicon Valley is bad at politics. If nothing else during Trump 2.0, I think we’ve learned that Silicon Valley doesn’t exactly have its finger on the pulse of the American public. It’s insular, it’s very, very, very, very rich — Elon Musk is now nearly a trillionaire! — and it plausibly stands to benefit from changes that would be undesirable to a large and relatively bipartisan fraction of the public.

  • Cluelessness on the left about AI means the political blowback will be greater once it realizes the impact.

  • Disruption to the “creative classes” could produce an outsized political impact.

So he never gets around to mentioning democracy, although he does predict revolution (I think) and frankly his entire post could use a good edit.

But what I am saying here is that with the current administration in power, acquiring expertise in AI is a scary proposition. The White House is already fooling around with AI, and this is not a regime known for exercising ethical restraints nor observing norms.

We have important midterm elections this fall, which will be the first big test in the age of AI for our oh-so-wobbly democracy.

HEADLINES:

Tuesday, February 10, 2026

Waiting

Out here on the coast, you can sense it when the rain is coming. There’s a slight change in the air, the light, the breeze.

They all converge and at some point will start squeezing moisture out of the heavy ocean atmosphere rolling in from the coast.

Until then we wait on what is to come.

Sort of like the midterm elections. We all know they will arrive as well, but what will they bring?

Is it to be a new season with fresh blooms, hope and renewal?

Or the continuation of the dark stormy seas of the past year, with all the hate, fear, destruction, and elimination of much of what is decent?

The midterms are as yet nine months off. The rains only a few hours away. We have time to prepare for both.

Call it a dress rehearsal. 

HEADLINES:

  • ‘Take the vaccine, please,’ a top US health official says in an appeal as measles cases rise (ABC)

  • How America Got So Sick (Atlantic)

  • 3 Policy Moves Likely to Change Health Care for Older People (NYT)

  • Legality of Trump’s $400M private funding for White House ballroom at issue (WP)

  • FBI launches missing-person billboards for Nancy Guthrie in Houston (Chron)

  • Maxwell refuses to answer questions about Epstein in congressional hearing (BBC)

  • Pressure grows on UK PM Starmer as Scottish Labour leader urges him to quit (Al Jazeera)

  • China critic and former media tycoon Jimmy Lai is sentenced to 20 years in a Hong Kong security case (AP)

  • ICE Has Been Detaining Irish Man With Valid Work Visa for Months (TNR)

  • Masks emerge as symbol of Trump’s ICE crackdown and a flashpoint in Congress (AP)

  • Trump plans to keep Democratic governors out of traditionally bipartisan meeting (WP)

  • The Mark Kelly Case Is Bigger Than It Seems (Atlantic)

  • GOP leaders fret as Trump sits out the party’s nastiest primary battles — with Senate control on the line (CNN)

  • Congress braces for DHS shutdown as funding bill negotiations stall – US politics live (Guardian)

  • A new kind of violent extremism is on the rise, rooted in 19th-century philosophy (WP

  • Oil, tariffs and farming: What we still don’t know about US-India trade deal (BBC)

  • As US Olympians call for tolerance and LGBTQ rights, some face Trump attacks and online hate (NPR)

  • Russia’s Federal Security Service said that the men suspected of shooting one of the country’s most senior military intelligence officers had confessed that they were carrying out orders from the Security Service of Ukraine.(Reuters)

  • In the Arctic, the major climate threat of black carbon is overshadowed by geopolitical tensions (AP)

  • San Francisco Teachers Walk Out for the First Time Since 1979 (NYT)

  • Grant Guidelines for Libraries and Museums Take “Chilling” Political Turn Under Trump (ProPublica)

  • China’s ‘micro drama’ industry emerges as jobs lifeline in tough graduate labour market (SCMP)

  • Fed on Reams of Cell Data, AI Maps New Neighborhoods in the Brain (Quanta)

  • Trump wants AI everywhere in government. See the 1,300 new ways it’s used. (WP)

  • Study Finds 98% Recidivism Rate Among Americans Who Burn Mouths On Hot Food (Onion)

Monday, February 09, 2026

Missing Things

That Super Bowl was the most boring game in memory. I stopped watching it once it became clear that it couldn’t help itself.

Instead, having noticed that Netflix is featuring some old Rob Reiner movies in the wake of his tragic death, I revisited “The American President” (1995), starring Michael Douglas.

You know one of the things I miss? A political leader I could look up to, instead of down at. A person with flaws (like all of us) but able to rise above them in the name of the common good.

Not a pilfering, perfidious predator. whose comprehension of the common good begins and ends with the image in his mirror.

There are many other things I miss, of course, that are more personal. That movie includes a romance, which reminded me of what I miss most of all.

Love.

HEADLINES:

Sunday, February 08, 2026

Sunday Mix

HEADLINES:

 

Saturday, February 07, 2026

Weekend Reader

It’s the weekend and I hope everyone relaxes and finds antidotes to the news. As for entertainment media, there are movies and sports, so especially where the weather is bad, go ahead and binge!

(Encounter)

HEADLINES:

  • How Autocrats Meddle With Elections (Atlantic)

  • Democrats Need to Get Serious About Stopping Trump From Rigging the Midterms (The Nation)

  • Democracy Under Occupation (Atlantic)

  • School officials say missing Minneapolis girl seen in ICE detention in Texas (WP)

  • Iran Refuses to End Nuclear Enrichment in Talks With U.S. (WSJ)

  • Russian general shot several times in Moscow (BBC)

  • The Globalization of Canadian Rage (NYT)

  • Trump wanted Dulles Airport and Penn Station named after him as condition of releasing rail tunnel funds (Politico)

  • Trump’s quest to name things after himself takes an even more desperate turn (CNN)

  • Racist video of Obamas removed from Trump’s social account (Axios)

  • Is Samuel Alito Preparing to Disrobe? (The Nation)

  • Minneapolis now has daily deportation flights. One man has been documenting them (NPR)

  • Justice Department Casts Wide Net on Netflix’s Business Practices in Merger Probe (WSJ)

  • After Roe, Conservatives Launch Coordinated Push to Kill Marriage Equality (Daily Kos)

  • 4 times as many measles cases in a few weeks than US typically averages in a whole year: CDC (CBS)

  • Uber Found Liable in Rape by Driver, Setting Stage for Thousands of Cases (NYT)

  • Savannah Guthrie’s demand for mom’s ‘proof of life’ is complicated in this era of AI and deepfakes (AP)

  • A bonobo tea party: Study shows humans aren’t the only species that can pretend (NBC)

  • The Olympics Are a Show of Global Harmony. The World Is Anything But. (NYT)

  • Kid Rock’s MAGA Country Music Festival Loses Shinedown and More Artists: ‘We Don’t Want to Participate in Something We Believe Will Create Division’ (Variety)

  • Moltbook was peak AI theater (Technology Review)

  • I Infiltrated Moltbook, the AI-Only Social Network Where Humans Aren’t Allowed (Wired)

  • Young people in China have a new alternative to marriage and babies: AI pets (WP)

  • Amazon’s $200 Billion Spending Plan Raises Stakes in A.I. Race (NYT)

  • TrumpRx Unveils $1 Million Citizenship Pill (Onion)

Friday, February 06, 2026

Just Talking

When sociolinguist Deborah Tannen published her book “You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation” in 1990, it helped me understand a pattern I’d noticed during my years in journalism.

Many of my male colleagues, including me, seemed to get ahead in media companies faster and win more awards than our female colleagues, despite the fact that we were not better reporters or writers.

If anything, when it came to interviewing sources, women seemed to be the better listeners, generally, so they sometimes got better and deeper information than we did.

Tannen’s book at least provided a context for all of this. She wrote:

“For most women, the language of conversation is primarily a language of rapport: a way of establishing connections and negotiating relationships ... For most men, talk is primarily a means to preserve independence and negotiate and maintain status in a hierarchical social order.”

Although she was talking mainly about personal rather than professional relationships, her book proved useful in my teaching jobs. I started pointing out to my women students that they might use their conversational preferences to their tactical advantage when interviewing men in positions of power.

Also, women journalists inside the company faced a similar challenge and therefore an opportunity. In that era, female colleagues tended to speak less in meetings, and when they did have something to say it more often was to raise a question, whereas the men favored making declarative statements and staking out a position.

The men also interrupted the women much more frequently than vice versa.

I’m not pretending that I was some sort of genius for noticing this stuff, because I wasn’t, but I could see that the whole situation was pretty unfair. And when around the same time the pay disparities between men and women surfaced, the whole thing started to really bother me.

I developed the kind of bad feeling I always get when confronted with injustice. All too easily, I knew, it could have been me on the outside, left out, feeling diminished. Despite whatever successes I had had, there were plenty of failures too, setbacks, betrayals and disappointments -- mainly but not exclusively dealt me by men.

And to be fair, there were some pretty mean moves put on by women colleagues as well, including behind-the-back betrayals that hurt a lot. In fact, they still hurt to this day. So I concluded neither sex had any claim to a higher degree of morality or decency in the media environment; it really boiled down to how each individual behaved in the moment.

Systemic discrimination existed, yes, but the impact of that reality varied widely person by person. Some turned out to be kind; some turned out to be mean.

Not to sound cynical, but I’m not sure all that much has changed to this day. At least at work, men and women still seem to misunderstand each other pretty much as ever. But least there is a much broader consciousness of the problem than in the past.

In any event, I haven’t met the person yet who couldn’t try just a little bit harder to understand the other. And that includes me. Maybe we just have to imagine that we are switching roles now and then. Isn’t that what the Golden Rule is all about?

(This is from five years ago.)

HEADLINES: