Friday, November 07, 2025

M.T.G. 2.0

How can it be that Marjorie Taylor Green is sounding like the last sane person in Congress.

If you didn’t catch her interview Thursday on CNN, you missed seeing a politician who rather than weave and bob and prevaricate simply stood on her principles and condemned both parties for the government shutdown. 

She took specific aim at the leaders of her own party, Mike* and John*. It was a refreshing change from the usual dribble emanating from Capitol Hill.

As things look now, she and her constituents (who are worried about the cost of health insurance, she says) may be the best hope to force those Congressional leaders to reopen the government before the holidays kick in.

In that regard, the administration is cutting ten percent of the flights at the busiest U.S. airports today, which will affect people who presumably have more political clout than the people struggling to find enough food to eat.

To date, it’s the poorest among us who have borne the brunt of the shutdown’s impacts, but that may be about to change. And since out of every political crisis, new leaders tend to emerge, we may need to prepare ourselves for an M.T.G. moment.

*Speaker of the House Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune.

HEADLINES:

 

Thursday, November 06, 2025

A Bad Day at Court

Listening to Wednesday’s Supreme Court hearing on the legality of Trump’s global tariffs was, like most such audio casts, somewhat disconcerting but also ultimately fascinating and even rewarding.

Trump’s argument, as articulated by his Solicitor General D. John Sauer, is that his beloved tariffs are legally permissible under an obscure law known as The International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA.

Sauer, who is unquestionably a brilliant fellow, possesses a high, squeaky voice that only gets higher and squeakier as he becomes agitated — which happened a lot on Wednesday.

Sauer also speaks almost unbelievably rapidly as his agitation rises until he basically sounds like Mickey Mouse on acid.

By contrast, the Supremes all sound calm and grounded. At one point one of them urged Sauer to slow down and I started feeling sorry for him. They tend to speak in deep, rich, measured tones, which just made squeaky Sauer sound more pathetic as he flailed around in the minutiae of IEEPA.

To get to the point of all this, the Justices, in their unsettling disembodied, God-like way, sounded deeply skeptical that IEEPA or any other precedent justified Trump’s unprecedented tariffs, sending the President’s team away deeply disappointed.

The Court has not yet ruled on the matter but it’s not looking good for the home team. I just hope that when D. John Sauer got home afterward he tried my grandmother’s cure for a raspy throat — warm water with honey, lemon and a dash of Scotch.

HEADLINES:

 

Wednesday, November 05, 2025

Anti-Trump Rising

“So hear me President Trump when I say this: to get to any of us, you will have to get through all of us.” — Zohran Mamdani

Voters around the country took their first opportunity in Trump’s second term Tuesday to reject him and his policies. In every race of significance, Democrats beat Republicans by wide margins.

It was a good night for America.

Besides winning the governor’s races in New Jersey and Virginia, and the mayor’s race in New York City, Democrats passed Prop. 50 in California to counter the GOP redistricting maneuver in Texas.

But there was a striking contrast among the victorious Democrats in their victory speeches. The two women (Spanberger and Sherrill) struck a gracious note, extending an olive branch to those opposing them and Republicans generally.

The two men (Mamdani and Newsom) were angry and defiant, declaring themselves warriors ready to stand up to Trump and his “war within.” Newsom sounded the alarm that Trump has been, is and will continue doing everything in his power to rig next year’s elections, so that fight has now been engaged.

Newsom spoke in a room almost devoid of people, with just a few flags, cameras, microphones, lights, crews and his wife. A lone reporter (from CNN) shouted questions that he ignored while exiting the scene. It seemed almost dystopian. 

There were no smiles or cheers, just a grim determination that the battle has begun.

HEADLINES:

Tuesday, November 04, 2025

In Name Only

Today’s another Election Day. Looking back, the only time I remember feeling a sense of unrestrained joy at the results of an election was 17 years ago when the U.S. elected Barack Obama its first black president.

But even then it was easy to see the trouble that lay ahead. Racism is too embedded in our history for a change like that to go unchallenged. Writing positive essays about Obama online had brought me one indication in the form of some withering attacks from readers outraged at the prospect of a non-white family in the White House.

Although a majority of voters had chosen Obama, almost half of the electorate was opposed, mostly for reasons directly or indirectly rooted in our country’s racial past. And for many of us, the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr., and its aftermath in 1968 was still a fresh memory four decades later.

Once in office, Obama conducted himself with grace and integrity — his eight years as president were essentially scandal-free. His greatest accomplishment other than the Affordable Care Act was simply proving that anyone (male) could be president.

But, egged on by racists like the real estate tycoon Donald Trump, the seething resentment felt by those who felt a black man could never be a legitimate president represented an electoral pot boiling over, just waiting to explode.

In 2016, when Obama left office, it did, bringing us Trump as president. Practically everything in our country has been in a state of utter chaos ever since.

Looking back, it’s clear that Trump’s main appeal has always been to the racist impulses deeply embedded in the American psyche. Our ancestors may have thought that they had settled these matters back in 1865, but 160 years later, the Civil War rages on. We are “One Nation Under God” in name only, all too easily divided against ourselves, and led by a tyrant skilled at doing so.

There is a lot more to the rise of Trump than race, of course, but it remains central to his story.

HEADLINES:

 

Monday, November 03, 2025

Trump Intl.

As Trump continues his drive to consolidate power domestically, it is worth remembering that authoritarian leaders typically attack other countries as part of their quest for domination.

Hitler did that, unleashing World War II in the process. Putin has been doing it more gradually for decades now.

In Trump’s case, he is already waging what is almost certainly an illegal war against Venezuela and the drug cartels allegedly headquartered there. His pretext is the drug overdose crisis in the U.S., which is a real problem that needs thoughtful attention by government officials.

I’m not sure that blowing up the unknown occupants of small boats off of South America’s coastlines fits the description of thoughtful attention, but again, this is just the pretext for Trump’s expansionist dreams.

(Remember his comments about Greenland, Canada and the Panama Canal.)

Now he is threatening what sounds like a modern-day Crusades against Nigerian Islamists who have allegedly killed a few Christians.

I’ve got news for the president. People of different religions, races and nationalities kill each other all over the world every day. It is appalling, but why does Trump get to choose one isolated situation above all others to threaten using the U.S. military?

There’s no mistaking what Trump is doing as he cherry picks targets around the globe. Like Putin and Hitler, he is not satisfied with merely achieving domestic control.

He is eyeing other parts of the globe where he can dominate as well and he has most of his term in office left to settle on targets.

HEADLINES:

 

Sunday, November 02, 2025

Sunday Reads

HEADLINES:

 

Saturday, November 01, 2025

American Hungry

I had a dream last night, a vivid dream. Whether it was the Parkinson’s, which is known for vivid dreams, or the phase of the moon, or my medications, or the fact that it was Halloween, or maybe such dreams are like earthquakes, you know, the stress to have one builds up over time until you just have a big one, I don’t know.

But I had it. 

In my dream, I had organized a huge event that stretched along a jagged line in an open area south of the city. Under a long string of tents, pretty much everyone I know or ever met was cooking their food specialities for members of the public.

And the public had shown up. Thousands of people had come, including many more people that I knew. Most of them were hungry but the majority of my friends just were there to taste the delicacies, sort of like at the food tents at Burning Man.

I went up and down the food line, checking on everybody. Clearly I was in charge. I explained that people should pay for the food if they could, but that it was fine to give it away as well.

Clearly, most of the people who’d come didn’t have the means to pay, but they were cheerful and willing to volunteer their services to help the operation run smoothly. There seemed to be a lot of bartering going on.

Before long, all of the food was gone. As I walked the line one last time, I remembered that my business plan depended on me getting a small cut of the sales from the vendors who had appeared at my event.

When I checked my pocket, I had one dollar bill.

***

Hunger in America is real and has long been one of our biggest and most persistent social problems. Just check out the two CBS documentaries from the 1960s, one by the legendary Edward R. Murrow.

The most recent estimates are that some 18 million people, or 13.5 percent of U.S. households in 2023, suffered from food shortages or its euphemism, “food insecurity.”

As our elected representatives, Republican and Democrat alike, play their high-stakes political games using hunger as one of their trump cards, and as our overweight President waddles off to his private golf resort in Florida, million of Americans are hungry.

And I had a dream about them. Today’s top story is from the L.A. Times, “Judges order USDA to restart SNAP funding, but hungry families won’t get immediate relief.”

HEADLINES: