Tuesday, December 14, 2021

Both Sides Now



Yesterday, as on every December 13th for many decades now, I reflected on the disappearance and death of Betty Van Patter. 

The 45-year-old Black Panther Party bookkeeper was an idealistic Berkeley mother who admired the party and its programs to help the poor.

But somebody killed her — perhaps for her ideals or her naiveté, or both — and the mystery of her murder has remained unsolved for 47 years.

Meanwhile, over the course of my half century in journalism, I worked on a lot of big stories. We got some, we didn’t get others, but I have very few regrets.

The Betty Van Patter case is one of my biggest regrets. The Alameda District Attorney, the Berkeley Police Department, several private investigators, a number of journalists other than me are among those who have looked into the case and come up empty-handed.

Some of the best work on the case has been done by investigative reporter Kate Coleman, who published one plausible scenario for Betty’s murder in the now defunct magazine Heterodoxy in 1994. Coleman revealed that the well-known private investigator David Fechheimer, who was working for the Panthers at the time of Betty’s murder, told his mentor, the legendary private eye Hal Lipset, who ordered Betty’s murder and who carried it out.

But neither of those individuals have ever been charged by authorities and they’ve denied knowledge of the matter.

I’ve appealed to the various media organizations I was affiliated with during my active years to look into the case but so far as I can determine, none of them have done so.

The problem with the story is obvious. Historians, academics, young activists and old activists alike want to be able to celebrate the positive legacy of the Black Panthers, which includes exposing the systematic racism that leads to the George Floyd killing, the assassination of Fred Hampton, the harassment and arrest of countless others, as well as the poverty and oppressive living conditions endured by millions of African Americans.

To fully tell the story of what happened to Betty Van Patter may seem to run counter to that narrative, because it brings up the Panthers’ internal corruption, violence, sexism, prostitution, drugs, shakedowns, weaponry and justification of gratuitous violence.

But an honest appraisal of the group’s place in history would be capable of holding both sides of the truth in one hand, both the good and the bad, unflinchingly.

I await the day that someone accomplishes that goal. If any younger journalist or group of journalists wanted to pick up the reins of the Van Patter investigation and finish the job, that would go a long way of closing the book on the good and the bad of the Panthers, told unflinchingly.

It may be worth noting that I have received a warning from a credible source that I should stop trying to get to the bottom of the Van Patter case and stop encouraging those who know the truth to step forward. 

I interpret that as a threat.

These essays are my response.

TUESDAY’S NEWS:

 

No comments: