'What' and 'if' are two words as non-threatening as words can be, but put them together side by side and they have the power to haunt you for the rest of your life. What if? What if? What if? -- (Letters to Juliet)
__________________
I'm not sure that there is anything more intoxicating to a journalist than speculation. By training and obligation, we work within the world of what can be proven -- the facts -- about any given situation, so "wishful thinking" or any such speculative endeavor is strictly out of bounds.
But of course we do speculate, endlessly, and that is ultimately how we end up getting some of our biggest stories. When that happens it starts with a hunch, then a theory, that slowly takes on the shape of reality as the evidence comes in.
There is no better feeling for a reporter than to have such a hunch come true, except for later when you can tell yourself that it actually made a difference in the world.
Naturally, this sort of experience is not confined to journalists; nothing of value is. Entrepreneurs pitch "what if" scenarios all the time, as in "what if we could disrupt this industry, it would be a multi-billion-dollar market!"
After that, go down the list. When scientists speculate, it's called a hypothesis, which like journalists they cannot publish until they've developed enough evidence to convince their peers that it is a plausible explanation for observable phenomena.
Political analysts dream up various scenarios whereby candidates can win close elections based on multiple factors, most of which boil down to voter turnout.
I'm sure you could add dozens of other professionals to this list -- sportscasters, doctors, weather forecasters, grandparents, space explorers. And, of course, what novelists do is speculation.
When it comes to me, I rarely indulge in speculation when considering the past, as in "what if I had taken that job offer, bought that house, listened to my heart with that relationship?" The reason is that it is all pointless now, and in many cases would only lead to regret at opportunities missed.
The future, however, is another matter, and about that I speculate constantly. That's the one part of life that remains open to speculation, unlike the past or even the present.
Positive speculation, which you also might call day-dreaming, frees my mind of the all-too-real constraints of my present situation to allow something else to happen.
In my dreams.
(This piece is from two years ago.)
HEADLINES:
13 former presidents of the U.S. have issued a joint statement in support of democracy (NPR)
Foreign reactions and offers of aid in response to Morocco earthquake (Reuters)
The juror who backed Trump and other Georgia grand jury takeaways (BBC)
The group that won Trump the election in 2016 may win it for him again in 2024 (CNN)
Newsom says it’s time to ‘move on’ from 2024 speculation, Harris ‘lined up’ after Biden (The Hill)
Elon Musk Is a Threat to Democracy (The Nation)
At G20 in India, Biden Looks to Fill a Hole Left by Putin and Xi (NYT)
Our Big Brains Have Shrunk. Scientists Might Know Why. (WSJ)
3 Reasons Why Hurricane Lee Is Stunning Meteorologists (Forbes)
Streaming Has Reached Its Sad, Predictable Fate (Atlantic)
New report finds employees were happier during the pandemic than they are now (CNBC)
What happens when AI replaces the traditional ‘first’ jobs? (Fast Company)
Microsoft offers legal protection for AI copyright infringement challenges (Ars Technica)
Adding generative AI systems may change your cloud architecture (InfoWorld)
Artificial intelligence technology behind ChatGPT was built in Iowa -- with a lot of water (AP)
As states move on AI, tech lobbyists are swarming in (Politico)
AI-powered killer robots poised to shape U.S.-China rivalry (Reuters)
Man Inspects Perimeter To Find Most Vulnerable Entry Point To Hamburger
No comments:
Post a Comment