Tuesday, April 23, 2024

AI: Threat to Writers?

 A sprawling article in The New Republic questions whether the coming of artificial intelligence (AI) spells the end for human writers. (TNR

“If a computer can write like a person, what does that say about the nature of our own creativity?” asks Samanth Subramanian.

The answer is, after a long winding trail of considerations, that nobody can yet say for sure, at least according to this author. But he seems to come out on the side of the human writer surviving in the end, and with that I agree.

The key word in this equation is “human.” In our society, human writers do much more than simply write. They invent and provoke and stimulate and define. They give voice to voiceless as well as to the unspeakable. They create the public narratives that help define both our social and private lives.

In fiction and nonfiction alike, they express the inner longings of the human spirit, which machines may emulate but cannot replicate.

Like artists of all kinds, writers’ work can be copied — we call it plagiarism — but as creators they cannot be replaced. AI may take away many of the jobs writers have; if so that will be a tragedy. But the writers will remain.

Writing is so much more than turning a phrase, word-smithing or even telling a story. Fundamentally, it’s about forging authentic human connections one at a time.

That will always be superior to the artificial connections enacted by machines.

And only a human being can tell the difference.

HEADLINES:

  • The seismic political fallout from Trump’s criminal trial is only beginning (MSNBC)

  • Will a Mountain of Evidence Be Enough to Convict Trump? (NYT)

  • Biden’s polls improve as Kennedy and third-party factor shifts (WP)

  • Why so many American leaders are advancing a new kind of nihilism (Atlantic)

  • Israeli military intelligence chief quits over 7 October attack (Guardian)

  • How the Israel-Gaza Protests Could Hurt the Democratic Party (NYT)

  • The Supreme Court this week will debate whether states have the power to outlaw lifesaving abortions in hospital emergency rooms. “This case could radically alter how emergency medicine is practiced in this country and make pregnant people second-class citizens in America’s emergency rooms,” the deputy director of the ACLU Reproductive Freedom Project said. [HuffPost

  • Europe is warming up faster than any other continent, and the heat is deadly (NPR)

  • Trillions of cicadas are about emerge in the Midwest and the South. Two different broods of these extremely loud bugs are set to crawl out of the ground together for the first time since 1803. (WP)

  • More than 70% of the global workforce is exposed to risks linked to climate change that cause hundreds of thousands of deaths each year, the International Labour Organization said. (Reuters)

  • Ignoring experts, China’s sudden zero-COVID exit cost lives (AP)

  • The pandemic cost 7 million lives, but talks to prevent a repeat stall (WP)

  • The Most Embarrassing Blunders From Elon Musk’s Attempt at AI-Generated News (Gizmodo)

  • Cecil Williams, longtime champion of the poor, co-founder of Glide church, dies at 94 (SFC)

  • AI and the End of the Human Writer (TNR)

  • AI Detects Mysterious Detail Hidden in Famous Raphael Masterpiece (ScienceAlert)

  • The future of AI gadgets is just phones (Verge)

  • AI Will Eventually Fade From View, By Design (Forbes)

  • ‘Seek Funding’ Step Added To Scientific Method (The Onion)

No comments: