Hunting Stories

For decades I worked with my fellow reporters producing stories. We would study the patterns in the events we were following, trying to connect the dots so we could beat other reporters to the story.

In the process, there may have been times that we were tempted to cut corners.

During the process of landing a big investigative story, we usually had identified a bad guy or a group of bad guys who were responsible for the situation we were trying to expose.

As part of that work, we would become interested in the bad guy’s psychology, and on occasion we would consult with psychologists to better understand that.

This was particularly important when we were tracking ongoing behavior, such as a series of crimes by a perpetrator not yet apprehended by the authorities.

So in those cases we were much like cops or intelligence agents, some of whom were often tracking the same targets as we were.

This is how journalists acquire some of their most valuable sources -- fellow investigators with similar objectives, which in all cases is catching the bad guy.

But this is also where problems can develop. One issue is when journalists get confused about whose agenda they are pursuing. As long as there is alignment, there is nothing wrong with a reporter and, say, a D.A. working to break the same case.

But their objectives are different -- the prosecutor is seeking to build a legal case, whereas the reporter is seeking to tell an accurate story.

While its may seem that those objectives are consistent with one another, the devil is in the details. There is a world of difference between what is legally provable in a court of law and what is publishable.

While all of this is happening in real time, any reasonably self-aware investigator starts turning inward to ask a few questions: “Why am I doing this work? Who am I to judge others? Which ends justify which means?”

There are many different possible answers to these questions. All I know for sure is that to continue with this kind of work over many decades, you need to have found the ones that work for you.

Otherwise you will stop.

(This is an edited version from an essay I wrote in 2021.)

HEADLINES:

• Newsom says he’ll sue to keep Trump from sending California National Guard to Portland (ABC)

• The new SCOTUS term will reshape America’s constitution (Economist)

• Supreme Court and Trump are headed for a reckoning in new term (WP)

• ‘The president is unhinged’: Trump’s online behavior grows increasingly odd (Guardian)

• Trump plan would limit Social Security disability benefits for older Americans (WP)

• The Anti-Social Century (Atlantic)

• Bill Nye leads charge to save NASA science from deep Trump cuts (Axios)

• Kash Patel fires FBI trainee who displayed pride flag (ABC)

• Former Army vice chief of staff ‘concerned’ about Hegseth’s ‘attack on women’ (The Hill)

• The Hague on Trial (New Yorker)

• Trump plans aid package for US soybean farmers while seeking trade deal with China (AP)

• Afghans awaited U.S. resettlement. Pakistan sent them back to the Taliban. (WP)

• Gaza flotilla activists allege mistreatment while being detained in Israel (AP)

• Forget Cowbells. Cows Wear High-Tech Collars Now. (NYT)

• Pete Hegseth Rails Against Fat Generals (Onion)

MUSIC VIDEO: Pistol Annies - Hell On Heels 2011