Friday, April 17, 2026

Don't Stop Writing

In the Age of AI, it may sound quaint, but when I used to teach writing courses, I recommended that students write every single day, 365 days of the year.

For those who find writing to be a challenge, that sounds like a pretty harsh assignment. Even for those to whom writing comes more easily, it may sound extreme.

But my reasoning (and my experience) is that making writing part of your daily exercise routine will pay dividends over time. And only over time can you expect to improve; with writing there are no instant fixes.

Enter artificial intelligence. Now, students can and are taking advantage of this technology to replace the work of learning the craft or writing with robot-generated texts.

It would appear that old writing teachers like me have lost the battle — definitively.

But wait! There is new evidence that living the more friction-less life AI offers is bad for your cognitive function. This is one of those “use it or lose it” situations.

According to neurologists interviewed by the Washington Post“Making life harder sounds deeply unfun, but it might be good for your cognitive function.” Also:

“The brain’s No. 1 job is to help you survive.”. 

The article continues: “Throughout your daily routines, the brain conducts a cost-benefit analysis to determine whether a choice is worthwhile. Challenges require more energy, so, whenever possible, the brain prefers ease to difficulty. The brain also responds to rewards, such as the dopamine hit that comes with instant gratification (whether easy entertainment during a social media scroll or a perfectly written text message courtesy of Claude, the artificial intelligence chatbot).”

Also: “In a 2025 study, researchers looked at 580 university students, 57 percent of whom used AI on a daily basis while the rest used it several times a week. They found greater AI use was linked to a reduction in critical thinking skills, possibly because of an association with cognitive fatigue — a depletion of mental resources essential for complex thinking. In another 2025 study, which looked at 666 people of diverse ages and educational backgrounds, a researcher found that AI was linked to a reduction in critical thinking skills. Cognitive off-loading, which is essentially using tools to reduce the cognitive load on your working memory, might impair the ability to engage in deep reflection.”

The good news is that by adding friction to your daily routines, this cognitive decline can probably be reversed. Here are five ways listed by the Post:

1. Try puzzles and games you’re not good at.

2. Learn something new.

3. Cook a recipe.

4. See a friend in person.

5. Don’t look up the answer.

***

To these five, I would add a sixth: 

Write something, perhaps just a page per day.

It will work wonders over time.

(Thanks to Leslie for pointing me to this excellent article.)

HEADLINES:

Thursday, April 16, 2026

Unknown Hero

While growing up, none of us learned about Elizebeth Smith Friedman, the Quaker girl from the Midwest who was in fact one of our greatest national heroes. We didn’t know that she had cracked German codes during World War I, helping the Allies to win that terrible conflict, then returned to her role as codebreaker to play a key role in defeating the Nazis in World War II.

In between the wars, she briefly received some press attention for helping authorities bust major gangsters, including Al Capone, but I don’t recall ever hearing about that in my childhood either.

One reason her work was ignored is that an egomaniacal publicity seeker named J. Edgar Hoover had claimed all the credit in the high-profile mobster arrests. We all learned Hoover’s version of the mobster wars and how his G-men had brought the criminals to justice.

Another reason was sexism. Women almost never got the credit they deserved for heroic deeds in the first 70 years of the 20th century; the men holding power in every sector of public life, including the press, made sure of that.

Not that Elizebeth worried too much about such matters herself. A modest person, self-contained, she didn’t much like the limelight.

But her crowning achievement — cracking ever more sophisticated German codes during World War II — remained completely hidden, secret from my generation when we were growing up largely because all of those involved, including Friedman, had to sign pledges that they would never speak of their work as long as they lived.

Friedman kept that pledge. She died in 1980.

Meanwhile, the insufferable Hoover was not required to sign any such pledge so he again took all the credit for busting the German spy rings during the war, embellishing his legend as well as that of his beloved FBI and ignoring the true heroes.

Only when long-classified records of the war-time code-breaking work done by Elizebeth and the small unit she created were declassified in 2000 did her role finally begin to come out into the open.

Even then, it took a sustained effort by a few scholars and activists, mostly women, to begin to get Elizebeth Smith Friedman a modicum of the posthumous credit she so richly deserves.

Ultimately, though, history has a way of evening out the playing field, doesn’t it? Engulfed by scandal at his death, today J. Edgar Hoover is widely remembered as a monumental jerk, although he does have a building named after him. Meanwhile, Elizebeth’s legacy has only recently started emerging but she already has a couple of reading rooms named in her honor.

For some revisionist history that is very much worth knowing, I recommend Jason Fagone’s The Woman Who Smashed Codes for those who wish to know more.

HEADLINES:

Wednesday, April 15, 2026

Another Ring on the Tree Trunk

So Tuesday was my 79th birthday, a time to look back and remember. This caused a certain degree of angst over regrets, actions both taken and not taken.

I’m also proud of certain things. Being a father six times over and a grandfather.

And of my career as a journalist.

It started small, as a freshman in college writing for the sports page of my college paper.

But it soon grew into a life-long passion for covering the use and abuse of power in all its manifestations.

I also am happy about more peaceful things — art, music, literature, nature. A friend from long ago sent me the first birthday message of my day. She wrote: “Despite destructive humans, nature keeps nurturing and spring is here. I saw a fox and a pheasant in the yard today. :)”

I liked that.

HEADLINES:

  • U.S. Oil Blockade Is Set to Boost American Exports—and Prices at the Pump (WSJ)

  • Why geography gives Iran an edge in the Strait of Hormuz (WP)

  • Middle East War Will Slow Global Economic Growth, I.M.F. Warns (NYT)

  • Orbán Was First. Trump Is Next. (Bulwark)

  • Trump’s Erratic Behavior and Extreme Comments Revive Mental Health Debate (NYT)

  • The International Committee of the Red Cross said it was deeply concerned by attacks on medical workers in Lebanon after a deadly strike on a Red Cross center in the country and the death of a volunteer a day ‌earlier. (Reuters)

  • Woman says Swalwell drugged and raped her; plans to file police report (MS)

  • Hegseth’s Unholy War (Atlantic)

  • Trump family deal spree could open door for future presidents to profit from office (AP)

  • Catholic Vance Breaks Silence on Trump’s Jesus-Like Image Amid Outcry From Other Conservatives (Time)

  • How Trump’s Jesus-like image and feud with the Pope are sparking backlash (BBC)

  • Most feel taxes are too high despite Trump’s tax changes, polls show (AP)

  • Anti-MAGA Rocker Slams Trump With Savage New Title (Daily Beast)

  • French woman, 86, held by ICE after moving to US to reunite with long-lost love (BBC)

  • Engagement” is a dumb metric (BI)

  • CEOs are betting AI will augment work rather than displace all workers (CNBC)

  • Anthropic Mythos And Embracing The AI ‘Bugmageddon’ (Forbes)

  • The attacks on Sam Altman are a warning for the AI world (Verge)

  • Pentagon Develops Tactical Zoot Suit (Onion)

Tuesday, April 14, 2026

Tuesday Mix


 (Please support my friend and colleague, Mark Fiore, by visiting his page on Substack.)


HEADLINES:

Monday, April 13, 2026

Monday Mix

HEADLINES:

  • Judge dismisses Trump $10B defamation lawsuit against Murdoch, WSJ about Epstein letter (CNBC)

  • Pope Leo says he has ‘no fear’ after Trump labels him ‘weak’ and ‘terrible’ in feud over Iran war (NBC)

  • Why Trump is threatening to blockade a strait that Iran is already blockading (CNN)

  • Starmer says UK will not support US blockade of Strait of Hormuz (Al Jazeera)

  • Hungary election: Trump ally Viktor Orbán concedes defeat after 16 years as prime minister (CNN)

  • Hungary’s Orban, Beacon to the Right, Concedes Election Defeat (NYT)

  • ‘Everything is gone’: Israel destroys entire villages in Lebanon (Guardian)

  • Iranians left disappointed but defiant after failure of peace talks with US (AP)

  • Iran Has Thousands of Missiles and Could Retrieve Launchers, U.S. Intelligence Finds (WSJ)

  • Fees for seas: a history of taxing waterways (FT)

  • 21 Hours in Pakistan: How Vance Tried and Failed to End a War He Opposed (NYT)

  • China, Iran weaponized global economy to beat U.S. at its own game (WP)

  • Ex-CIA director calls for ousting Trump: ‘25th amendment was written with him in mind’ (Guardian)

  • Swalwell Suspends Campaign for California Governor Amid Sexual Assault Accusations (NYT)

  • Some House members say they’ll vote to expel Reps. Eric Swalwell and Tony Gonzales (NBC)

  • What spending probes at DHS reveal about Kristi Noem’s time in office (WP)

  • Years of drought has major energy port of Corpus Christi, Texas, wrestling with water crisis (AP)

  • China says it will resume some ties with Taiwan after visit by opposition leader (Politico)

  • Where Does Our Free Time Go in Retirement? Too Often, It’s Social Media (WSJ)

  • America’s new retirement age (BI)

  • ‘There’s a lot of desperation’: skilled older workers turn to AI training to stay afloat (Guardian)

  • How AI is getting better at finding security holes (NPR)

  • CBS Announces Retirement Of Longtime Masters Commentators Captain Cooter And The Gooch (Onion)

Sunday, April 12, 2026

Big Questions for Tiny Minds



So let’s just say it’s the case that there are no new ideas. Mark Twain famously thought so. 

So does Google’s AI:

“True originality is unlikely after centuries of human thought, meaning innovation is actually the recombination, recontextualization, or new application of existing ideas. Creativity is viewed as a ‘mental kaleidoscope’ rearranging old ideas into new patterns, perspectives, or personal expressions.”

Don’t ask me why, but recently, I started watching “The Miniature Wife” on Peacock. Although the concept is reminiscent of a 1989 comedy, “Honey, I Shrunk the Kids,” this story is about the complex dynamics in a troubled marriage, with the fate of the world hanging in the balance as a subplot. Comedic relief is largely missing.

Elizabeth Banks plays the six-inch-tall wife, shrunk to that size by her mad scientist husband, played by Matthew Macfadyen. Unfortunately, the provocative bits of content about big questions in this series are interrupted constantly by giant ads, which sends a sad message of its own. What good is a subscription to Peacock if it only yields such an irritating format?

Meanwhile, the idea of confronting just how small our lives and concerns are in the overall scheme of things was enhanced this week by the spectacular Artemis II moon venture.

Only from outer space can we glimpse just how tiny each of us is in a vast universe of other stars and universes. Collectively, as a species, we amount to a speck in the sky.

One hopes that we as a species can learn from this insight, and that we can perhaps figure out how to do more than joke about it.

Our best scientists, artists, poets and (rare) leaders have been urging us to try and transcend our tribalism, embrace our enemies, and live in peace — but are we truly capable of that?

Check out this morning’s headlines.

Maybe it’s just too big a challenge for us, small as we are.

HEADLINES:

 

Saturday, April 11, 2026

Kickers

Lots of writers have asked me over the years about the best way to write endings, or kickers, to their stories. This is an especially difficult question to answer when you’re telling a depressing story. How can you leave your readers with something other than an utter sense of hopelessness?

And, given the seriousness of, say, global environmental threats, should you even try to do that?

My answer is yes.

As to the how, whenever possible try to find a life-affirming aspect to whatever story you are telling, and close with that. It takes some additional reporting and some hard thinking to locate the set of facts or perspectives that may allow readers to absorb all of the bad news and still feel empowered to go on, better informed about dangers, but not necessarily bereft of hope.

Endings are as natural as beginnings. At the very end of my own stories, I like to find something to leave readers with that can encourage them to find even a small piece of inspiration going forward.

If only a joke from The Onion.

(I published the first version of this short essay 19 years ago.)

HEADLINES:

Friday, April 10, 2026

Zealotry

(Note: I just rediscovered this essay written back in 2007, and it feels relevant today, so here goes.)

By reading books about Islam, I’m trying to piece together histories never taught in school. Somewhere around 25-30 books are under my belt now, but I'm not sure I'm making much progress. The latest was The Crusades Through Arab Eyes, by Amin Maalouf, which left me marveling at the wanton bloodshed caused by both sides during those inglorious eras.

Did you know that some of the Crusaders acted as cannibals, and hunted Arab villagers down for food? Do you know how the Cult of the Assassins came about? This book documents those and other atrocities. 

I find myself speculating how the pools of Jews, Christians, and Moslems persisted side by side in the Middle East for millenia, albeit with major pogroms launched against Jews, and wars between the other two now and again. But, still, in the in-between times, the regular times when there was no great war, how did they get along?

The Jew, the Christian, the Moslem, each with his holy book, all originating in the same cradle of civilization. And now very much at war, in our time, with an idiot king, I mean President, who summoned the awful cry of the Crusaders in his call to action following 9/11, not even knowing how his words would reverberate throughout an Islamic world that has not forgotten the stains of that past.

That political leaders of both major parties in the U.S. cannot summon the courage to admit this country has made a major mistake by invading Iraq is frightening evidence that the war was never about anything more than securing our addictive supply of oil, rationalized as a mission to "democratize," (read: "Christianize") the heathens (the "Believers.") Bush the Decider is utterly clueless about the Middle East.

His coterie of advisors, however, knew exactly what they were doing. Now they are getting desperate, never a good thing in geopolitics. Expect something horrific to happen before next year's elections.

Know why I don’t practice any religion?

Because I love life and I love being alive and I love people. I had a button in the Sixties (as many others did) that said simply: God is Love.

HEADLINES:

 

Thursday, April 09, 2026

The Leaf

One summer afternoon when I was a young boy in Michigan, I was lying on my back in a field staring up at a large tree. It was one of those windless days, hot and still. 

After a while, I realized that a single leaf was for no apparent reason turning on its stem. As far as I could see, this leaf was identical to all the other leaves on the tree, but it was the only one moving.

Why? 

One leaf turning might have a story. Many leaves holding in place most likely do not.

The problem with this for journalists is that by focusing on the exception to the rule, we may give the impression that the rule is no longer in order. An example of this is crime reporting. Covering one shocking crime too intensely can create the illusion that an entire city is “awash in crime” when the fact is the opposite is true. 

In fact, most dramatic crimes are actually just anomalies. 

Of course, there is an entirely different way to tell any story. That solitary leaf I saw may have been ahead of its time — portending a climate disaster to come when all the other leaves remained quiet, steady in place, doing what they were expected to do.

In other words, the swinging leaf was a whistleblower, a ‘canary in the coal mine,’ an indicator of bigger problems.

On to the investigative reporter, who picks up on the signal and spots a pattern that may provide an explanation for the turning leaf. After observing hundreds of trees, with many thousands of leaves, and interviewing numerous scientists, none of whom can say for sure, the reporter writes a more nuanced story based on the data.

In this new story, we learn that there are many such single leaves on many trees turning slowly on windless days where no one is there to see. But it is also possible that if no one saw them then that didn’t really happen. (Quantum physics.) Then again, perhaps there is a new disease affecting our trees that we need to address if we are to save the forest.

Anyone trying to follow these various stories may think back to that one single leaf turning on a windless day long ago. In that case, you might say that the storyteller wasn’t able to see the forest for the trees.

(This is the latest version of one of my oldest essays.)

HEADLINES:

 

Wednesday, April 08, 2026

Slow Down, Christian Soldiers


I can still remember the words to that oddly militant hymn sung in my church as a youth:

“Onward, Christian soldiers, 
marching as to war,
With the cross of Jesus
going on before!
Christ, the royal Master,
leads against the foe;
Forward into battle,
see his banner go!”

I didn’t like the song then and I don’t like it now. But the difference is that today, under the expansionist “Christian Nationalism” of Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth, for the first time I fear the meaning behind its lyrics.

By threatening the "whole civilization” of Iran with destruction Monday, Trump tried to frame his illegal war against Iran into a fight to the death between Islam and Christianity.

He also committed a war crime, according to modern standards.

In the process, he sank to the same hateful level as the mullahs who’ve run Iran for 47 years with their “Death to America” and “Death to the Jews” chants.

The great majority of the Iranian people do not share those sentiments at all. Like you and me, they love their families and friends, they work hard, and they hope for a safer, more secure world for their children and grandchildren.

Then, with the world holding its collective breath, just before his so-called deadline last night, Trump backed down. He did what he usually does — change his mind — and for that we can thank whatever God we believe in (or not). It’s obvious that for now he has seized the cover of a two-week ceasefire agreement offered via Pakistan to try and save face from the horror of his earlier statement.

But so much damage has been done. 

Meanwhile, Iran now claims it has achieved control over the Strait of Hormuz under the new ceasefire, which if true would constitute an epic failure on Trump’s part. Like most of the Crusades of yore, this one too appears to be ending in failure.

HEADLINES: