Wednesday, December 03, 2025

War Crimes and Cowards

A piece of advice for young writers: Do not use words carelessly. Try to be precise. English provides plenty of options to achieve specificity.

This is especially important for journalists covering the Pentagon. Consider, for example, these two words: war crimes.

A war crime is a violation of the laws of war. It’s a war crime to not grant quarter to survivors of an attack. 

To connect this with the news, under the laws of war, after you’ve bombed a boat and discover that two survivors are clinging to the wreckage, you must grant them quarter, i.e., you can’t just kill them.

Yet this happened in the Sept. 1 attacks by the U.S. military on a small boat off the coast of Venezuela. The two survivors were killed in a second strike, and the question now is who gave the order.

Trump’s Secretary of “War,” Pete Hegsmeth had been loudly boasting about his role in the attacks until the little matter of a possible war crime came up. Then he beat a hasty retreat, saying that the ranking officer involved — Admiral Frank Bradley — was the responsible party.

At this point, it’s worth noting that the only reason this controversy has surfaced at all is that we still have a free press, and the reporters covering the story have paid attention to the details of the case and chipped away at Hegsmeth’s ever-changing set of explanations.

Hegsmeth seems pretty nervous about where all this may be heading. They have a word in the Navy for a guy like him.

Coward. 

HEADLINES:

No comments: