Saturday, November 12, 2022

Don't Tread On Us

As more data from the midterm election results comes in, we can now see that abortion was the key issue for many of the voters who turned what might have been a GOP “red wave” into more or less a “hold” for the Democrats.

So it may be helpful to look back on how this happened. The effort by recent Republican presidents to stack the Supreme Court with ideological extremists, rather than jurisprudence experts, backfired when the court struck down protections for abortion a few months before the election.

Until that decision, the expectations on all sides was for a massive GOP win in November. But people all over the political spectrum reacted negatively to the court’s ruling, and that changed everything.

The earliest indication something was afoot politically was the overwhelming defeat of a state initiative to ban abortion in Kansas, one of the reddest of red states.

What is clear now is that a solid majority of Americans not only want to protect a woman’s right to choose, they also hold Republicans accountable for threatening that right.

In that sense, they don’t wish to turn back the clock and they said so loud and clear last Tuesday.

Many legal analysts believe that other rights, such as same-sex marriage, may be at risk if the legal reasoning applied in the abortion ruling is expanded to other cases pending before the court, and some Republicans have said as much.

Accordingly, the credibility of the Supreme Court, though not on the ballot directly, clearly was delivered a body blow on November 8th.

As a consequence, conservatives may wish to hesitate before electing more candidates who would appoint judges intent on rolling back the rights most Americans now take for granted. This may be a new twist on the American revolutionary tradition of “Don’t Tread on Me.” That revolutionary-war-era phrase may have been misappropriated by reactionaries in recent times, but mainstream Americans are now reclaiming it, as Tuesday’s results confirmed.

NEWSLINKS:

 

No comments: