'What' and 'if' are two words as non-threatening as words can be, but put them together side by side and they have the power to haunt you for the rest of your life. What if? What if? What if? -- (Letters to Juliet)
__________________
I'm not sure that there is anything more intoxicating to a journalist than speculation. By training and obligation, we work within the world of what can be proven -- the facts -- about any given situation, so "wishful thinking" or any such speculative endeavor is strictly out of bounds.
But of course we do speculate, endlessly, and that is ultimately how we end up getting some of our biggest stories. When that happens it starts with a hunch, then a theory, that slowly takes on the shape of reality as the evidence comes in.
There is no better feeling for a reporter than to have such a hunch come true, except for later when you can tell yourself that it actually made a difference in the world.
Naturally, this sort of experience is not confined to journalists; nothing of value is. Entrepreneurs pitch "what if" scenarios all the time, as in "what if we could disrupt this industry, it would be a multi-billion-dollar market!"
After that, go down the list. When scientists speculate, it's called a hypothesis, which like journalists they cannot publish until they've developed enough evidence to convince their peers that it is a plausible explanation for observable phenomena.
Political analysts dream up various scenarios whereby candidates can win close elections based on multiple factors, most of which boil down to voter turnout.
I'm sure you could add dozens of others to this list -- sportscasters, doctors, weather forecasters, grandparents, space explorers. And, of course, what novelists do is entirely speculation.
When it comes to me, I rarely indulge in this when considering the past, as in "what if I had taken that job offer, bought that house, listened to my heart with that relationship?" The reason is that it is all pointless now, and in many cases it would only lead to regret at opportunities missed.
The future, however, is another matter.
(I first published this essay in September 2021.)
HEADLINES:
U.N. Court Orders Israel to Prevent Genocide, but Does Not Demand Stop to War (NYT)
South Africa’s genocide case against Israel spotlights a global divide (WP)
Trump Biographer Has Damning Theory About Why Trump Keeps Attacking E. Jean Carroll (HuffPost)
Donald Trump ordered to pay E. Jean Carroll $83.3 million in defamation damages trial (WP)
Cruz, Graham defend Trump’s ‘mental stability’ as Haley, Pelosi attack it (Politico)
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott Just Took His War With the Feds to the Next Level (TNR)
US border policy deal within reach despite efforts by Trump to derail it, senators say (Guardian)
Trump Strengthens Grip on Capitol Hill as He Presses Toward Nomination (NYT)
America’s Remarkably Resilient Economy (WSJ)
Why the US economy is doing so much better than the rest of the world (CNN)
Yemen Houthi rebels fire a missile at a US warship, escalating worst Mideast sea conflict in decades (AP)
Consciousness Is a Continuum, and Scientists Are Starting to Measure It (Scientific American)
How ‘Killers of the Flower Moon’ Presses Up Against the Limits of Empathy (NYT)
Schools are using surveillance tech to catch students vaping (AP)
Poisoned AI went rogue during training and couldn't be taught to behave again in 'legitimately scary' study (LiveScience)
Etching AI Controls Into Silicon Could Keep Doomsday at Bay (Wired)
Google’s New AI-Powered Browser Could Mark the End of the Human Internet (New York)
Another search breakthrough? You.com debuts AI that can answer multi-step questions (Venture Beat)
After AI beat them, professional Go players got better and more creative (Escaping Flatland)
The Sleepy Copyright Office in the Middle of a High-Stakes Clash Over A.I. (NYT)
Kamala Harris Reprimanded For Playing ‘The Sims 4’ On Work Computer (The Onion)
No comments:
Post a Comment