Saturday, March 14, 2026

49 Years Ago, CIR is Born



In April 1977, Lowell Bergman and I were discussing how to form a new journalism organization in the wake of the demise of our informal muckraking unit inside Rolling Stone.

Over the preceding two years at the magazine’s headquarters at 625 Third Street in Soma, we’d pulled together a half dozen or so reporters to pursue investigative stories, which had resulted in some good stories and also a ton of trouble.

Along with a bunch of awards, we had proven an ability to attract death threats and huge libel suits, among other forms of attention. We had both been unceremoniously dumped by Jann Wenner just before Christmas 1976 when he announced he would be taking the magazine to the east coast.

Our idea was to form a non-profit to carry on that type of work and Lowell brought an ally into the mix -- Dan Noyes, who he’d met in the “Arizona Project.” That was a group investigation into the murder of journalist Don Bolles, which in turn led to the creation of another non-profit group, Investigative Reporters and Editors (IRE).

The three of us -- Bergman, Noyes and myself -- co-founded the Center for Investigative Reporting (CIR) later in 1977. A large group of advisers helped us launch the organization and we settled into an office in downtown Oakland.

But back in April, we had been still discussing what such an organization should be, what it should do, what its essential identity should be.

Today, 49 years later, CIR and IRE have long been staples of the journalism world and we are working individually on our memoirs. In that context, Lowell recently unearthed an old type-written letter he had sent to Dan that April. Dan and I had not yet met and Lowell wanted to introduce him to my thoughts on the subject.

“I talked with Weir --as expected he is enthusiastic. Interestingly, David presented the following perspective: (the group should have) two major groups of activity: publications and community involvement.”

This old letter is a prime example of why I spend so much energy beseeching people to preserve their journals, letters, notes and files whenever possible. Until Lowell sent a copy of it to me recently, I had absolutely no memory of having said those things.

But clearly I was envisioning not only a journalism organization but one that would attempt to root that work in the communities where we worked.

The Bay Area was our base. It was a region with deep contradictions -- idealism, activism and hope with violence, cynicism, and deeply entrenched reactionary media organizations, notably the old Hearst daily, the San Francisco Examiner.

We couldn’t know it at the time, but that same newspaper would be transformed by a talented group of our peers, including the heir to the Hearst publishing empire, Will Hearst, into an excellent newspaper in its final decades.

We participated in that transformation. We also found our way into relationships with dozens of other media groups -- CBS News, NBC News, ABC News, 60 Minutes, 20/20, Mother Jones, New West, New York, NHK, BBC, etc., here and around the world.

There were many ups and downs in the early years, including press conferences denouncing us, and/or announcing libel suits and more death threats, but ultimately CIR survived and thrived. How that came to be is the story the three of us need to tell in our memoirs.

NOTE: Early in 2024, Mother Jones and CIR merged into a single organization.

HEADLINES:

  • U.S. Military Attacks Iran’s Oil Export Hub, Trump Says (NYT)

  • Trump: ‘When oil prices go up, we make a lot of money’ (The Hill)

  • Ships identify themselves as Chinese around Strait of Hormuz during Iran war to avoid attacks (AP)

  • 6 killed in U.S. refueling plane crash; Iran’s new supreme leader ‘likely disfigured,’ Hegseth says (NBC)

  • Weakened by War, Iran Hits Back by Strangling a Vital Waterway (NYT)

  • A complex tug-of-war inside the White House is driving US President Donald Trump’s shifting public statements on the course of the Iran war, as aides debate when and how to declare victory even as the conflict spreads across the Middle East. Read our exclusive. (Reuters)

  • Wall Street Bankers Offered Lucrative Access to Join the Pentagon (NYT)

  • Why China could emerge a winner from Trump’s global energy shock (WP)

  • The ‘Chinese Dream’ is shrinking for Gen Z (BI)

  • Cuban President Acknowledges Talks With Trump Administration (NYT)

  • The US may move some of its anti-missile system - and it’s sparking unease in South Korea (BBC)

  • A federal judge criticizes the government for pursuing an investigation of Jerome H. Powell. (NYT)

  • Election Records Handed Over to the FBI in Maricopa County, Arizona, Could Be Fatally Flawed, Experts Say (ProPublica)

  • Shot by Border Patrol, Then Called a “Domestic Terrorist” (New Yorker)

  • Old Dominion shooter convicted of Islamic State ties released from prison just 2 years before attack (AP)

  • Synagogue Attacker Killed Himself During Gunfight With Guards, Officials Say (NYT)

  • The US slashed research for cancer, Alzheimer’s, mental health — and nearly everything else (Vox)

  • E.P.A. Moves to Weaken Limits on a Cancer-Causing Gas (NYT)

  • A new wave of disrupters takes on American health care (Economist)

  • Congressional Democrats say Trump tariffs will cost US households more than $2,500 this year (AP)

  • China’s nuclear warhead storage a ‘highly concentrated risk’, US report says (SCMP)

  • MPs ‘deeply troubled’ by BBC World Service funding uncertainty (BBC)

  • They Want to Rebuild. Can They Afford to Prevent the Next Fire, Too? (NYT)

  • The Fog of AI (Atlantic)

  • How Pokémon Go is giving delivery robots an inch-perfect view of the world (TR)

  • China’s DeepSeek gives US tech giants a run for their money as Microsoft and others expand AI push in Africa (BI)

  • Working in A.I. Lifted Their Compensation. Now They Want Prenups. (NYT)

  • Inside the Dirty, Dystopian World of AI Data Centers (Atlantic)

  • Meta Delays Rollout of New A.I. Model After Performance Concerns (NYT)

  • Trump, Mitch McConnell Clash In Oval Office Over Where They Are (Onion)

 

No comments: