Wednesday, March 22, 2023

Dueling Fairy Tales (Reprise)

Tuesday, March 21, 2023

Ring of Truth

During my recent trip to Arizona, my sister told me a story about an incident that happened when I was in kindergarten. Apparently, she and I were sitting on our front porch when I spotted a girl I liked from my class walking toward our house on the sidewalk.

As the girl drew near, I grabbed a newspaper, held it up and pretended to read it.

“That happened today?” I called out loudly. “How interesting!”

***

Most of the time, I’m the oldest one in the room, so when it comes to memories, mine reach back the furthest. So it is a refreshing experience whenever I get to hang out with my sisters, who remember things that I don’t.

It is also nice to be just a character in the memory of others as opposed to the being the family patrician and sole custodian of the now-distant past.

I was almost 30 when my first child was born, and almost 60 when my first grandchild was born. That’s a lot of rings on the tree for me to try and recall when my descendants ask me specific questions about the past.

Besides, the way I tell a tale is not necessarily more accurate than anyone else, plus the more distant in the past an event occurred, the more our individual versions are likely to diverge, which brings me to the phenomenon of memory consensus.

Within families, communities, countries, cultures — even on a species level — we ultimately tend to reach some sort of consensus about the past, though historians, ideologues, contrarians and poets continue to debate and revise that consensus as new evidence emerges.

And as much as I enjoy telling my descendants stories from the past, I’m acutely aware from my journalism career that for a more well-rounded narrative, other sources ought to be interviewed. My version is only that — mine.

A joint family memoir would no doubt do a better job. As the saying goes, ‘there’s your version, my version and then there’s the truth and no one is lying.’

As for the story of the girl and the newspaper at the top of this essay, I had no memory of it until my sister told me about it last week.

That said, it has the ring of truth.

LINKS:

 

Monday, March 20, 2023

To Be Or Not To Be...Obsolete

I’m not confident we’ll know when we’ve crossed the threshold to singularity, that point where machine intelligence exceeds our own; perhaps we’ve already done so. But it doesn’t really matter because does anyone think we can restrain ourselves from the technological wonders that await us?

It’s too late for that. Therefore, maybe we should celebrate our status as the last generation of humans that is biologically distinct from the hybrid species we’re hell-bent on morphing into.

As such, future beings may look upon us as somewhat quaint, curious creatures who actually believed we could solve problems better than our machine extensions. How sweet!

Every day now, without even trying, I include a half dozen or so links to fascinating reports on AI — Some believe it is a grave threat to our humanity; others think it promises nirvana. I’m pretty much an in-betweener on that question. 

Clearly there will be functional improvements in many fields thanks to LLMs and chatbots. In medicine alone, AI will be helpful in diagnostics for sure. No one human brain can possibly hold all the known diseases and their symptoms, so robots will prove to be useful assistants in this regard.

But I wonder what’s to become of human beings generally when we are no longer much needed for our labor. What will we do with ourselves? Play games all the time?

So far we have kept ourselves occupied with a range of professions almost all of which are at risk of replacement by ever-smarter robots. We’re in need of the best philosophers to help us grasp our next steps.

Because the engineers don’t know what to say.

LINKS:

 

Sunday, March 19, 2023

Above the Law?

There is an unmistakable parallel between the International Criminal Court’s arrest warrant for Putin and Trump’s imminent indictment in New York. Trump, of course, has often expressed his admiration for Putin, and tried to emulate his authoritarian tactics after he lost the 2020 election.

Given what happened when Trump incited his supporters to march on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6th, 2021, it is deeply disturbing that he is once again calling for protests if and when he is arrested. If violence occurs, we may once again face a Constitutional crisis here in the U.S.

Meanwhile, it is highly unlikely the ICC will be able to enforce its order to arrest Putin anytime in the foreseeable future, so he will remain an alleged war criminal who remains free to commit more crimes.

So what does all of this mean for the principle that no one is above the law?

We’re about to find out. If the rule of law, domestically and internationally, is to remain viable, court orders have to be enforceable and they have to be enforced.

In this context the ICC warrant is one thing — neither Russia nor the U.S. is a signatory to the agreement establishing its jurisdiction.

And in the U.S., although the legal path forward is clearer, no former President has ever been arrested, so if this happens, it will represent an event without precedent.

Stay tuned.

LINKS: